首页> 外文期刊>Computational Mechanics >Study of impinging turbulent jet flows using the isotropic low-Reynolds number and the algebraic stress methods
【24h】

Study of impinging turbulent jet flows using the isotropic low-Reynolds number and the algebraic stress methods

机译:利用各向同性低雷诺数和代数应力法研究冲击射流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The performance of two-equation turbulence models (such as the low Reynolds number k–ɛ model of Launder and Sharma 1974) is evaluated versus the algebraic stress model (ASM) (Rodi 1976) for high Reynolds number (Re=9×104) jet flows with strong streamline curvature due to impingement onto a flat plate. The partial differential equations for the conservation of mass and momentum are solved using a finite volume method and the predicted velocities are compared to experimental data by Myszko (1997). The paper demonstrates that in the free-jet region both models over-predict the thickness of the jet. The ASM predicts faster jet growth rate and smaller jet thickness than the low Reynolds number model resulting to closer agreement with the experiments. As a consequence of the better performace of the ASM in the free-jet region, predictions in the wall-jet region showed that despite the use of the logarithmic law-of-the-wall function, the ASM results are closer to the experimental points than the predictions obtained with the two-equation model. However, the rate of peak velocity decay is far higher than the experimental one with both turbulence models. Again, the decay rate predicted with the ASM fits better the exprimental data. The implementation of the ASM exhibited convergence problems most of which were atributed to the cross-derivative terms in the k and ɛ equations and were treated using a linear under-relaxation technique. In general the ASM predictions were more accurate than the low Reynolds number k–ɛ model, with an extra computational cost of less than 25%, which makes the model very attractive for the prediction of turbulence characteristics of high Reynolds number flows with strong stramline curvature.
机译:与高雷诺数(Re = 9×104 )射流由于撞击到平板上而流线曲率很强。用有限体积法求解了质量和动量守恒的偏微分方程,Myszko(1997)将预测的速度与实验数据进行了比较。本文表明,在自由射流区域中,两个模型都过度预测了射流的厚度。 ASM预测比低雷诺数模型更快的射流生长速率和更小的射流厚度,从而与实验更加吻合。由于自由射流区域ASM的性能更好,壁射流区域的预测表明,尽管使用了对数壁垒定律函数,但ASM结果更接近实验点比使用两方程模型获得的预测要高。但是,两种湍流模型的峰值速度衰减率均远高于实验值。同样,使用ASM预测的衰减率更适合实验数据。 ASM的实现存在收敛问题,其中大多数归因于k和ɛ方程中的交叉导数项,并使用线性欠松弛技术对其进行了处理。一般而言,ASM预测比低雷诺数k–ɛ模型更准确,额外的计算成本不到25%,这使得该模型对于预测具有强Stramline曲率的高雷诺数流的湍流特性非常有吸引力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Computational Mechanics》 |2002年第5期|381-389|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Steam Boilers and Thermal Plants Thermal Engineering Section Department of Mechanical Engineering National Technical University of Athens Zografou 15780 Athens Greece e-mail: nsour@chemeng.ntua.gr;

    Process and Systems Analysis Design and Development Section Department of Chemical Engineering National Technical University of Athens CFDU Zografou 15780 Athens Greece;

    Steam Boilers and Thermal Plants Thermal Engineering Section Department of Mechanical Engineering National Technical University of Athens Zografou 15780 Athens Greece e-mail: nsour@chemeng.ntua.gr;

    Computer Center Process and Systems Analysis Design and Development Section Department of Chemical Engineering National Technical University of Athens Zografou 15780 Athens Greece;

    Process and Systems Analysis Design and Development Section Department of Chemical Engineering National Technical University of Athens CFDU Zografou 15780 Athens Greece;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Keywords Jet flows; Impinging jets; Algebraic stress model; Low Reynolds number model; Abbreviations ASM; Algebraic Stress Model; RSM; Reynolds Stress Model; LRM; Low Reynolds Number Model;

    机译:关键词射流;射流撞击;代数应力模型;低雷诺数模型;缩写ASM;代数应力模型;RSM;雷诺应力模型;LRM;低雷诺数模型;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号