...
首页> 外文期刊>Communications in numerical methods in engineering >Forming-limit diagram numerical predictions: yield criteria studies
【24h】

Forming-limit diagram numerical predictions: yield criteria studies

机译:成形极限图数值预测:屈服准则研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this work, it is shown the numerical formulation for prediction of the right-hand side of forming limit diagram (FLD). Five different yield criterias were used: Von Mises', Hill's (1948), Hill's (1979), Logan and Hosford's and Hill's (1993). Two new explicit equations for the equilibrium conditions using Von Mises and Hill's (1948) yield criteria are presented. The results were compared against theoretical and experimental data present in the literature with good agreement. The materials used in the comparison were the 2036-T4 aluminium and the AK, IF e EEP steels. It was observed that the predicted FLD was strongly influenced by the type of yield criterion used in the analysis. The best agreement between the predicted curves and the experimental data for each material was obtained from different criteria. The best result for the AK steel was achieved from the Logan and Hosford's criterion. The 2036-T4 aluminium was better represented when the Hill's (1993) criterion was used. The IF and EEP steels were well represented by results based on either Hill's (1979) or Logan and Hosford's criterion.
机译:在这项工作中,显示了用于预测成形极限图(FLD)右侧的数值公式。使用了五个不同的产量标准:冯·米塞斯(Von Mises),希尔(Hill)(1948),希尔(1979),洛根(Logan)和霍斯福德(Hosford)和希尔(1993)。使用冯·米塞斯(Von Mises)和希尔(Hill)(1948)的屈服准则,提出了两个新的平衡条件显式方程。将结果与文献中的理论和实验数据进行了比较,吻合良好。比较中使用的材料是2036-T4铝和AK,IF e EEP钢。观察到,预测的FLD受分析中使用的产量标准类型的强烈影响。每种材料的预测曲线与实验数据之间的最佳一致性是从不同标准中获得的。根据洛根(Logan)和霍斯福德(Hosford)的标准,获得了AK钢的最佳结果。当使用Hill(1993)的标准时,更好地代表了2036-T4铝。根据Hill(1979)或Logan和Hosford的判据可以很好地代表IF和EEP钢。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号