首页> 外文期刊>The communication review >Latina/o Communication and Media Studies Today: An Introduction
【24h】

Latina/o Communication and Media Studies Today: An Introduction

机译:今日拉丁裔/传播和媒体研究:简介

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Not long ago, in the late eighties, as I tried to develop a syllabus that included Latina/os [then known as Hispanics] for a "minorities and media" class, there was very little material one could assign. One could choose from the occasional data on Hispanic media and the already developing literary analysis written by Chicanas such as Gloria Anzaldua or more personal testimonials such as Cherrfe Moraga. As well, some of the work by Charles Ramirez Berg and Chon Noriega was beginning to show up both in Chicano Studies anthologies and some film studies collections, especially the ones with a focus on race. Clint Wilson and Felix Gutierrez's Minorities and Media: Diversity and the End of Mass Communication (Sage, 1985) stood out as a lonely voice in the attempt to come to terms with commonalities of media treatment of ethnic populations. As well, Federico Subervi-Velez's dissertation on issues of politics, ethnic assimilation, and mass media was just about finished and would launch his long trajectory studying these important issues. Scholarship on ethnicity, acculturation, and rhetorical approaches to identity formation of Hispanics was in its infancy with the groundwork being laid out by Conquerwood (1985) among others. In sum, there was relatively little work on Latina/os and communications or the mass media, including the mainstream research areas of television, advertising, and journalism and the press—all three areas with a growing tradition in regard to African Americans and the media. In the few collections where there was an attempt to talk across ethnicities, Latina/os were distant second in relation to African Americans in terms of scholarly attention. The academic discourse did not differ much from popular discourses wherein the imagined racial diversity of the U.S. nation was treated as binary—that is, Black and White. In this schema, Latina/os, as well as other ethnic groups such as Asian Americans and Native Americans, among others, fell beyond the scope of public discussion and academic research.
机译:不久前,在八十年代末期,当我试图为“少数派和媒体”课程开发包括Latina / os(后来称为“西班牙裔”)的教学大纲时,几乎没有材料可以分配。人们可以从偶尔在西班牙媒体上获得的数据中进行选择,也可以从诸如Chiloras的Gloria Anzaldua之类已经发展的文学分析或诸如Cherrfe Moraga之类的更多个人推荐中进行选择。同样,查尔斯·拉米雷斯·伯格和乔·诺列加的一些作品也开始出现在《奇卡诺研究》选集和一些电影研究收藏中,尤其是那些注重种族的作品。克林特·威尔逊(Clint Wilson)和菲利克斯·古铁雷斯(Felix Gutierrez)的《少数派与媒体:多样性与大众传播的终结》(萨奇,1985年)在试图与媒体对待族裔群体的共通性时表现出一种孤独的声音。同样,Federico Subervi-Velez关于政治,种族同化和大众媒体问题的论文也即将完成,并将展开他研究这些重要问题的漫长轨迹。关于种族,文化适应和用西班牙人身份形成的修辞方法的奖学金尚处于起步阶段,Conquerwood(1985)等人奠定了基础。总之,在拉丁美洲/非洲和传播或大众媒体方面,包括电视,广告,新闻学和新闻界的主流研究领域,工作很少,这三个领域在非洲裔美国人和媒体方面的传统都在不断增长。 。在少数尝试跨种族交流的收藏中,就学术关注而言,拉美裔/黑人在非裔美国人中仅次于第二。学术话语与大众话语并没有太大区别,在大众话语中,美国民族的想象的种族多样性被视为二元的,即黑白两色。在这种情况下,拉丁裔美国人以及其他种族群体,例如亚裔美国人和美洲原住民,都超出了公众讨论和学术研究的范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号