首页> 外文期刊>The communication review >SCOLDING JOHN Q.: ARTICULATING A NORMATIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLITICS AND ENTERTAINMENT
【24h】

SCOLDING JOHN Q.: ARTICULATING A NORMATIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLITICS AND ENTERTAINMENT

机译:责骂约翰·Q:促成政治与娱乐之间的规范关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The 2002 hostage drama John Q. triggered a discussion among journalists, the public, and the policy community about the proper relationship between politics and entertainment. In this debate the criteria for good journalism and good political discourse were frequently invoked to evaluate this Hollywood film. This discussion, which spilled out of the film criticism pages into news and commentary pages, shows how public-sphere models of political discourse are privileged even though they may not be a good fit for fictional media. John Q.'s success in triggering public discussion and awareness about health policy issues seems to illustrate DeLuca & Peeples's (2002) claim that the "public screen" is a more useful metaphor for thinking about politics than the public sphere (Habermas, 1989). John Q. seemed to particularly raise the ire of critics because of its unambiguous critique of domestic policy and its implicit suggestion that collective solutions are needed.
机译:2002年的人质剧《约翰·Q》引发了记者,公众和政策界对政治与娱乐之间适当关系的讨论。在这场辩论中,经常引用良好新闻报道和良好政治话语的标准来评估这部好莱坞电影。这场讨论从电影评论页面溢出到新闻和评论页面,显示了公共领域的政治话语模型如何享有特权,即使它们可能不适合虚构媒体也是如此。约翰·Q(John Q.)在引发公众对卫生政策问题的讨论和认识方面的成功似乎说明了德卢卡和皮普尔斯(DeLuca&Peeples,2002)的说法,即“公共屏幕”比起公共领域,是一种更有效的政治思考隐喻(Habermas,1989)。 。约翰·Q(John Q.)似乎特别引起批评家的愤慨,因为它对国内政策的明确批评以及它隐含的暗示需要集体解决方案的暗示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号