首页> 外文期刊>Communication Quarterly >Recognizing Differences and Commonalities: ThernRhetoric of Health and Medicine and Critical- Interpretive Health Communication
【24h】

Recognizing Differences and Commonalities: ThernRhetoric of Health and Medicine and Critical- Interpretive Health Communication

机译:认识差异和共同点:健康与医学修辞学和关键性-解释性健康交流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We are colleagues in a generalist communication department that has a depth of facultyrnin health communication. This depth creates potential for collaboration, but wernhave observed that our different theoretical and methodological approaches (e.g.,rnpost-positivist, rhetorical, critical-cultural, critical-interpretive) can make collaborationrnchallenging. Thus, participating in the 2013 NCA discussion panel about thernemergence of rhetorical studies of health, science, and medicine proved to be a goodrnopportunity for us to have an in-depth conversation about our disciplinary assumptions.rnWe both enjoyed the discussion immensely, but we found that Heather, whornuses critical-interpretive approaches, had a very different reaction to the event thanrndid John, who hails from the rhetoric of science.
机译:我们是通才交流部门的同事,有着丰富的卫生保健交流知识。这种深度创造了合作的潜力,但是我们已经观察到,我们不同的理论和方法论方法(例如,后实证主义,修辞学,批判文化,批判解释)可以使协作变得富有挑战性。因此,参加2013年NCA关于健康,科学和医学的修辞学研究的兴起的讨论小组被证明是我们就学科假设进行深入讨论的一个很好的机会.rn我们俩都非常享受讨论,但是我们发现希瑟(Heather)使用批判性解释方法,对事件的反应与约翰(Johnrndid)的反应截然不同,约翰(Johnrnd)来自科学的言论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Communication Quarterly》 |2015年第5期|498–503|共1页
  • 作者

    John A. Lynch; Heather Zoller;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Communication, University of Cincinnati, 144C McMickenHall, Cincinnati, OH 45221;

    Department of Communication at the University of Cincinnati;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:23:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号