首页> 外文期刊>Cluster Computing >A comparison of utility-oriented algorithms for scheduling parallel tasks in multi-cluster grid
【24h】

A comparison of utility-oriented algorithms for scheduling parallel tasks in multi-cluster grid

机译:面向实用程序的多集群网格中并行任务调度算法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Scheduling parallel tasks in multi-cluster grid can be seen as two interdependent problems: cluster allocation and scheduling parallel task on the allocated cluster. In this paper both rigid and moldable parallel tasks are considered. We propose a theoretical model of utility-oriented parallel task scheduling in multi-cluster grid with advance reservations. On the basis of the model we present an approximation algorithm, a repair strategy based genetic algorithm and greedy heuristics MaxMax, T-Sufferage and R-Sufferage to solve the two interdependent problems. We compare the performance of these algorithms in aspect of utility optimality and timing results. Simulation results show on average the (1+α)-approximation algorithm achieves the best trade-off between utility optimality and timing. Genetic algorithm could achieve better utility than greedy heuristics and approximate algorithm at expensive time cost. Greedy heuristics do not perform equally well when adapted to different utility functions while the approximation algorithm shows its intrinsic stable performance.
机译:在多集群网格中调度并行任务可以看作是两个相互依赖的问题:集群分配和在分配的集群上调度并行任务。本文同时考虑了刚性和可模制的并行任务。我们提出了一种具有提前保留的多集群网格中面向效用的并行任务调度的理论模型。在该模型的基础上,我们提出了一种近似算法,一种基于遗传算法的修复策略以及贪婪启发式MaxMax,T-Sufferage和R-Sufferage,以解决这两个相互依赖的问题。我们在效用最优性和时序结果方面比较了这些算法的性能。仿真结果表明,平均(1 +α)逼近算法在效用最优性和时序之间达到了最佳折衷。与贪婪启发式算法和近似算法相比,遗传算法可以实现更好的效用,而代价却是昂贵的。贪婪启发式算法在适应不同的效用函数时效果不佳,而近似算法显示出其固有的稳定性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号