首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Oral Investigations >Demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft and platelet-rich plasma vs platelet-rich plasma alone in infrabony defects: a clinical and radiographic evaluation
【24h】

Demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft and platelet-rich plasma vs platelet-rich plasma alone in infrabony defects: a clinical and radiographic evaluation

机译:骨缺损中脱矿质的冻干同种异体骨和富血小板血浆与仅富血小板血浆相比:临床和放射学评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this work is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA)/platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combination with PRP alone for the treatment of infrabony defects 18 months after surgery and to examine the influence of radiographic defect angle on the clinical and radiographic outcomes. Twenty-eight infrabony defects were treated with DFDBA/PRP combination or PRP alone. Clinical parameters and radiographic measurements were compared at baseline and 18 months. Interquartile range was performed to classify the defect angles. Mann–Whitney, Wilcoxon test, and Pearson correlation were used to analyze the data. The DFDBA/PRP combination exhibited more favorable gains in both clinical and radiographic parameters than PRP alone group (p < 0.05). A correlation existed between defect angle, defect depth, and clinical/radiographic outcomes for the defects treated with DFDBA/PRP. The narrow defects presented more favorable clinical attachment level values (CAL) gain, probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction and defect resolution than wide defects in the combination group (p < 0.05). The influence of baseline defect angle was not significant in the PRP-alone group (p > 0.05). The results indicate that DFDBA/PRP combination is more effective than PRP alone for the treatment of infrabony defects, and the amount of CAL gain, PPD reduction, and bone fill increases when the infrabony defect is narrow and deep before DFDBA/PRP combination treatment.
机译:这项工作的目的是比较脱钙的冻干同种异体骨移植(DFDBA)/富血小板血浆(PRP)与单独的PRP联合治疗术后18个月的骨下缺损的临床和放射学结果,并检查其影响影像学缺陷角度对临床和影像学结果的影响。用DFDBA / PRP组合或单独使用PRP治疗了28个骨下缺损。在基线和18个月时比较临床参数和影像学测量值。进行四分位间距以对缺陷角度进行分类。使用Mann-Whitney,Wilcoxon检验和Pearson相关性分析数据。与单独使用PRP组相比,DFDBA / PRP组合在临床和放射学参数上均显示出更有利的获益(p <0.05)。对于使用DFDBA / PRP处理的缺陷,缺陷角度,缺陷深度与临床/放射学结果之间存在相关性。与组合组中的广泛缺陷相比,较窄的缺陷表现出更有利的临床附着水平值(CAL)增益,探查袋深度(PPD)降低和缺陷分辨率(P <0.05)。仅PRP组基线缺损角度的影响不显着(p> 0.05)。结果表明,DFDBA / PRP组合比单独使用PRP更有效地治疗骨下缺损,并且在DFDBA / PRP联合治疗之前,当骨下狭窄而狭窄时,CAL增值,PPD减少和骨充盈量增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号