...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Oral Investigations >Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws
【24h】

Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws

机译:锥形束牙科CT,口腔内数字和常规X线摄影的准确性,可用于检测根尖周病变。猪颚的离体研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To compare the accuracy of cone beam CT scanning (NewTom 3G) with intraoral periapical radiography (Dixi2, Planmeca CCD sensor and Insight film) for the detection of periapical bone defects. Ten frozen pig mandibles were used. All soft tissues were removed and the jaws were sagittally sectioned to obtain three blocks from each side of the jaw containing the premolars and the molars with surrounding jaw bone. All teeth with intact roots were then “extracted”. First, 15 blocks were used to define defect size and exposure parameters; then, the remaining 45 blocks were divided into three equal groups. In one group, cylindrical defects of 1 × 1 mm were prepared beyond the apices of the extraction sockets, in another group defects of 2 × 2 mm were similarly prepared, while no defects were prepared in the last group. The teeth were replaced into their sockets and digital and conventional radiographs of all blocks were taken under reproducible conditions. In addition, all blocks were CT scanned with the same volumetric data and then reconstructed to provide sagittal and coronal 2-D sections. Masked evaluation of the images (defect present vs no defect) was performed by four calibrated examiners. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA and the significance level was set to P < 0.05. NewTom 3G was statistically significantly better in terms of sensitivity (54%), positive (82.6%) and negative (44.5%) predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy (61%) when compared with digital radiographs (23%, 60%, 31%, 39%), and with conventional ones (28%, 70%, 35%, 44%)—except in the positive predictive value. Specificity was similar for all three methods. No difference was observed between the two periapical (digital vs conventional) radiographs. NewTom 3G may be useful in cases of immediate implants intended to replace teeth with suspicion for possible existing endodontic pathology, or in candidate implant sites neighboring such teeth.
机译:为了比较锥束CT扫描(NewTom 3G)与口腔内根尖成像(Dixi2,Planmeca CCD传感器和Insight膜)检测根尖周骨缺损的准确性。使用了十只冷冻的猪下颌骨。除去所有软组织,并从颌骨的两侧矢状切开颌骨,以得到三个块,其中包含前磨牙和臼齿以及周围的颌骨。然后“拔出”所有具有完整牙根的牙齿。首先,使用15个块定义缺陷大小和暴露参数;然后,将其余的45个区块分为三个相等的组。在一组中,在拔牙窝的顶端以外准备了1×1 mm的圆柱形缺陷,在另一组中,同样准备了2×2 mm的缺陷,而在最后一组中没有准备任何缺陷。将牙齿放回其牙槽中,并在可复制的条件下拍摄所有牙块的数字和常规X射线照片。此外,所有块均用相同的体积数据进行CT扫描,然后重建以提供矢状和冠状二维切片。由四名校准的检查员对图像进行遮罩评估(存在缺陷与无缺陷)。使用ANOVA进行统计分析,显着性水平设置为P <0.05。与数字X射线照片(23%,60%,31%)相比,NewTom 3G在灵敏度(54%),阳性(82.6%)和阴性(44.5%)预测值以及诊断准确性(61%)方面显着改善。 ,39%)和常规方法(28%,70%,35%,44%),除了阳性预测值外。三种方法的特异性均相似。两次根尖周X光片(数字与常规)之间未见差异。 NewTom 3G在立即植入的情况下可能是有用的,其目的是怀疑牙齿可能存在的牙髓病变,或在此类牙齿附近的候选植入部位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号