首页> 外文期刊>Climate dynamics >Complex networks for climate model evaluation with application to statistical versus dynamical modeling of South American climate
【24h】

Complex networks for climate model evaluation with application to statistical versus dynamical modeling of South American climate

机译:复杂的气候模型评估网络,适用于南美气候的统计模型和动态模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study we introduce two new node-weighted difference measures on complex networks as a tool for climate model evaluation. The approach facilitates the quantification of a model's ability to reproduce the spatial covariability structure of climatological time series. We apply our methodology to compare the performance of a statistical and a dynamical regional climate model simulating the South American climate, as represented by the variables 2 m temperature, precipitation, sea level pressure, and geopotential height field at 500 hPa. For each variable, networks are constructed from the model outputs and evaluated against a reference network, derived from the ERA-Interim reanalysis, which also drives the models. We compare two network characteristics, the (linear) adjacency structure and the (nonlinear) clustering structure, and relate our findings to conventional methods of model evaluation. To set a benchmark, we construct different types of random networks and compare them alongside the climate model networks. Our main findings are: (1) The linear network structure is better reproduced by the statistical model statistical analogue resampling scheme (STARS) in summer and winter for all variables except the geopotential height field, where the dynamical model CCLM prevails. (2) For the nonlinear comparison, the seasonal differences are more pronounced and CCLM performs almost as well as STARS in summer (except for sea level pressure), while STARS performs better in winter for all variables.
机译:在这项研究中,我们在复杂网络上引入了两个新的节点加权差异度量,作为气候模型评估的工具。该方法有助于量化模型再现气候时间序列的空间协方差结构的能力。我们使用我们的方法来比较模拟南美气候的统计和动态区域气候模型的性能,以500 mPa处的2 m温度,降水,海平面压力和地势高度场为变量。对于每个变量,均从模型输出构建网络,并根据从ERA-Interim重新分析得出的参考网络进行评估,该参考网络还驱动模型。我们比较了两个网络特征,(线性)邻接结构和(非线性)聚类结构,并将我们的发现与传统的模型评估方法联系起来。为了设定基准,我们构建了不同类型的随机网络,并将其与气候模型网络进行了比较。我们的主要发现是:(1)对于除地理势高度场以外的所有变量,在夏季和冬季,通过统计模型统计模拟重采样方案(STARS)可以更好地重现线性网络结构,在该模型中动态模型CCLM占优势。 (2)对于非线性比较,季节差异更加明显,CCLM在夏季(除海平面压力外)的性能几乎与STARS相同,而在所有变量下,STARS的冬季性能都更好。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Climate dynamics》 |2015年第6期|1567-1581|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research,P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany,Department of Physics, Humboldt University, Newtonstr. 15,12489 Berlin, Germany;

    Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research,P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany,Department of Physics, Humboldt University, Newtonstr. 15,12489 Berlin, Germany;

    Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research,P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany;

    Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research,P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany,Stockholm Resilience Center, Stockholm University,Kraeftriket 2B, 11419 Stockholm, Sweden;

    Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research,P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany,Department of Physics, Humboldt University, Newtonstr. 15,12489 Berlin, Germany,Institute for Complex Systems and Mathematical Biology,University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB243UE, United Kingdom;

    Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research,P.O. Box 60 12 03, 14412 Potsdam, Germany,Department of Geography, Humboldt University,Rudower Chaussee 16, 12489 Berlin, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Climate model evaluation; Complex networks; South American climate; Network comparison;

    机译:气候模式评估;复杂的网络;南美气候;网络比较;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:32:00

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号