首页> 外文期刊>Cities >Negotiating risk in property-based arts economic development: Exploring the innovative but untimely development partnership between the Seattle Art Museum and Washington Mutual
【24h】

Negotiating risk in property-based arts economic development: Exploring the innovative but untimely development partnership between the Seattle Art Museum and Washington Mutual

机译:谈判房地产艺术经济发展中的风险:探索西雅图美术馆与华盛顿互助银行之间创新但过时的发展伙伴关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Property-led arts development (PAD) is central to urban policy and planning. The demand for physical arts infrastructure runs parallel with the public call for arts nonprofits to act more entrepreneurial in shaping and re-imaging urban space. Increasingly, these groups have become active property developers negotiating the risks and rewards of land development rather than remaining passive fundraisers of bricks and mortar campaigns. This shift in organizational identity raises questions about whether the politics of urban arts development have changed. This study asks four questions: (1) how are nonprofit arts organizations becoming more entrepreneurial in property development, (2) how are nonprofit arts organizations reshaping the urban landscape through development partnerships, (3) how are nonprofit arts developers responding to the 2008 economic crash, and (4) how does PAD align with new thinking on downtown development alliances? This research explores the innovative but failed land development deal between the Seattle Art Museum and the now-defunct Washington Mutual to build a joint tower in the central business district. Their atypical privateonprofit partnership changed Seattle's downtown landscape through flexible ownership structures, generous planning incentives and off-budget municipal maneuvers. The lauded project turned sour when the homegrown financial institution collapsed, forcing the museum into debt with limited private or public sector solutions. While SAM overcame the immediate crisis, the case is a cautionary tale about the long-term risk of contemporary PAD. The case shows that innovative practices do not predetermine success. Further, the partnership study illuminates how contemporary arts investments reflect as well as contradict new thinking in urban politics literature about evolving patterns of influence in U.S. downtowns.
机译:房地产主导的艺术发展(PAD)对于城市政策和规划至关重要。对体育基础设施的需求与公众呼吁艺术非营利组织在塑造和重新构想城市空间方面采取更多的企业家精神相呼应。这些团体越来越多地成为积极的房地产开发商,他们在谈判土地开发的风险和回报时,不再是被动的筹款活动。组织身份的这种转变引起了人们对城市艺术发展政治是否改变的质疑。这项研究提出了四个问题:(1)非营利性艺术组织如何在房地产开发方面变得更具企业家精神;(2)非营利性艺术组织如何通过发展伙伴关系重塑城市景观;(3)非营利性艺术开发商如何应对2008年经济危机崩溃;(4)PAD如何与关于市区发展联盟的新思维相一致?这项研究探索了西雅图美术馆与现已倒闭的华盛顿互助银行之间在土地中央交易区建造一座联合塔楼的创新但失败的土地开发协议。他们非典型的私人/非营利合作伙伴关系通过灵活的所有权结构,慷慨的计划激励措施和预算外的市政措施改变了西雅图的市区景观。当本土金融机构倒闭时,这个备受赞誉的项目变酸了,由于私营或公共部门解决方案有限,博物馆不得不负债累累。尽管SAM克服了眼前的危机,但此案是有关当代PAD的长期风险的警示性故事。该案例表明,创新做法并不能决定成功。此外,合作伙伴关系研究阐明了当代艺术投资如何反映以及与城市政治文学中关于美国市中心影响力发展模式的新思维相矛盾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号