首页> 外文期刊>Cities >Co-location of manufacturing and producer services in Nanjing, China
【24h】

Co-location of manufacturing and producer services in Nanjing, China

机译:制造和生产者服务在中国南京的共置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Most existing research examines the spatial patterns of manufacturing and producer services via separate investigations and from provincial and municipal perspectives. This paper, however, analyzes the co-location of manufacturing and producer services and their influencing factors from an intra-urban perspective. This empirical study is based in Nanjing and uses a 2001 basic unit census dataset and a 2008 economic census dataset at the firm level. The results show that the suburbanization process of manufacturing was much faster than that of producer services and indicate the establishment of producer services in the urban core and manufacturing in the periphery. The employment of producer services was highly concentrated in urban centers in the two interval years, but gradually expanded to surrounding new towns such as Jiangning, Pukou, and Luhe. In contrast, the employment in manufacturing was dispersed with substantial distribution in the old City and in suburban development zones. Manufacturing and producer services were largely co-located in the new towns of Jiangning and Pukou and national development zones. The spatial autoregression model indicates that the spatial distribution of manufacturing and producer services was subject to the joint effects of agglomeration economics and urban land price, which led the two sectors to retain a degree of spatial separability, even though their co-location was preferable. The distribution of manufacturing was significantly affected by land prices and constantly reconcentrated from urban centers to development zones and township industrial parks in suburban areas. Comparatively, the distribution of producer services was not significantly affected by land price and gradually occupied city centers with high land prices because the sector had a stronger capacity for bid rent. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:现有的大多数研究都是通过单独的调查以及从省市的角度来研究制造业和生产者服务的空间格局。但是,本文从城市内部的角度分析了制造业和生产者服务的共同定位及其影响因素。该实证研究基于南京,并使用了公司一级的2001年基本单位普查数据集和2008年的经济普查数据集。结果表明,制造业的郊区化过程要比生产者服务业快得多,这表明生产者服务业在城市核心和外围制造业的建立。在间隔的两年中,生产者服务的就业高度集中在城市中心,但逐渐扩展到了江宁,浦口和六合等周边新城镇。相反,制造业就业分散在旧城和郊区开发区,且分布广泛。制造和生产服务主要集中在江宁和浦口的新市镇和国家开发区。空间自回归模型表明,制造业和生产者服务业的空间分布受到集聚经济学和城市土地价格的共同影响,这导致两个部门尽管在同一地点都比较可取,但仍保持一定程度的空间可分离性。制造业的分布受到土地价格的极大影响,并且不断地从城市中心转移到郊区的开发区和乡镇工业园区。相比之下,生产者服务的分配并未受到土地价格的显着影响,而是逐渐占据了土地价格高的城市中心,因为该部门的投标租金能力较强。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cities》 |2017年第3期|81-91|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Chinese Acad Sci, Nanjing Inst Geog & Limnol, Key Lab Watershed Geog Sci, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Nanjing Inst Geog & Limnol, Key Lab Watershed Geog Sci, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Nanjing Inst Geog & Limnol, Key Lab Watershed Geog Sci, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China;

    Henan Univ, Key Res Inst Yellow River Civilizat & Sustainable, Kaifeng 475001, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Co-location; Agglomeration economics; Bid rent; Producer services; Manufacturing Nanjing, China;

    机译:主机代管;集聚经济学;投标租金;生产者服务;中国南京;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号