首页> 外文期刊>Cities >The high life: A policy audit of apartment design guidelines and their potential to promote residents' health and wellbeing
【24h】

The high life: A policy audit of apartment design guidelines and their potential to promote residents' health and wellbeing

机译:高尚生活:对公寓设计指南及其对促进居民健康和福祉的潜力的政策审核

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Globally, the rapid construction of apartments has ignited concerns about the quality and amenity of new housing, and the impact of poor design on residents. In Australia, different planning policies/guidelines for apartment development apply across states, however there has been no assessment of how these policies address health. We audited apartment design guidance for their inclusion of provisions that impact on health and wellbeing. Policies/guidelines (n = 10) were reviewed, including both current and proposed/superseded documents in states undergoing policy change to track policy progression. Requirements were extracted relating to health-promoting themes identified in the literature (e.g., daylight, ventilation, acoustic privacy, space). Each policy/guideline was scored based on the percentage of health-promoting design criteria addressed. Scores for current policies ranged from 83% (New South Wales) to 20% (Queensland and South Australia). Scores in states undergoing policy change increased, indicating a greater focus on health (e.g., 11% to 75% in Western Australia). Where minimum space standards were stipulated, there was a lack of agreement about where the standard should be set. Several states had policies that, if fully implemented, could promote residents' health. However, post-implementation evaluation is required to assess whether guidelines are applied as intended and provide evidence to inform minimum standards.
机译:在全球范围内,公寓的快速建造引发了人们对新住房的质量和便利性以及不良设计对居民的影响的担忧。在澳大利亚,各州适用不同的公寓开发规划政策/指南,但是尚未评估这些政策如何解决健康问题。我们审核了公寓设计指南,其中包括影响健康和福祉的规定。审查了政策/指南(n = 10),包括正在进行政策变更以跟踪政策进展情况的州的现行文件和拟议文件/已取代文件。提取了与文献中确定的促进健康的主题有关的要求(例如,日光,通风,声学隐私,空间)。每个政策/指南均根据所解决的健康促进设计标准的百分比进行评分。当前政策的得分范围从83%(新南威尔士州)到20%(昆士兰州和南澳大利亚州)。接受政策变更的州得分提高,表明对健康的重视程度更高(例如,西澳大利亚州为11%至75%)。在规定了最低空间标准的地方,关于应在何处设定标准缺乏共识。一些州制定的政策如果得到充分实施,可以促进居民的健康。但是,需要进行实施后评估,以评估指南是否按预期应用,并提供证据以告知最低标准。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cities》 |2020年第1期|102420.1-102420.13|共13页
  • 作者单位

    RMIT Univ Sch Global Urban & Social Studies Ctr Urban Res 124 La Trobe St Melbourne Vic 3000 Australia|Univ Western Australia Sch Design Australian Urban Design Res Ctr 35 Stirling Highway Crawley WA 6009 Australia;

    Univ Western Australia Sch Design Australian Urban Design Res Ctr 35 Stirling Highway Crawley WA 6009 Australia;

    RMIT Univ Sch Global Urban & Social Studies Ctr Urban Res 124 La Trobe St Melbourne Vic 3000 Australia;

    Univ Melbourne Grattan St Parkville Vic 3010 Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Apartment design; Health and wellbeing; High density; Health audit; Policy; Australia;

    机译:公寓设计;健康与福祉;高密度健康审核;政策;澳大利亚;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号