首页> 外文期刊>Church History >Beginnings: Ancient Christian Readings of the Biblical Creation Narratives. By Peter C. Bouteneff. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2008. xv + 240 pp. $22.99 paper.
【24h】

Beginnings: Ancient Christian Readings of the Biblical Creation Narratives. By Peter C. Bouteneff. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 2008. xv + 240 pp. $22.99 paper.

机译:起点:圣经创造叙事的古代基督教读物。彼得·C·布滕涅夫(Peter C.密歇根州大急流市:贝克学术杂志,2008年。xv+ 240页,每卷22.99美元。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This superb study of early Christian interpretations of Genesis 1–3 fills a majorngap in the literature. It traces several themes from the Hebrew Bible and the NewnTestament through the second-century Christian apologists, Irenaeus and Origen,nto the fourth-century Cappadocians. Bouteneff uses the first three crucial chaptersnof the Bible as a case study, enabling him to trace the origins and growth of earlynChristian methods of interpretation. He shows that Genesis 1–3 was largelynignored in the Hebrew Bible, though Jewish inter-testamental writers focusednon them, providing several different interpretations of Adam and paradise. Innthe New Testament, especially Paul’s letters, Adam appears as a contrast tonJesus Christ, who inaugurated the new humanity. Beginning in the NewnTestament itself, early Christians used typology and allegory to make connections between Old Testament figures and events on the one hand andnChrist on the other, to show him as the center of history. Early Christianninterpreters and theologians, following the lead of the New Testament,ndeveloped these methods extensively. Yet, they also took literal meaningsnseriously. Their biblical interpretations generally emphasized moral paraenesisnand Christology. A counterexample, the second-century apologist Theophilusnof Antioch rejected typological exegesis and never mentioned Christ. Bouteneffnsees these two absences are closely connected (73).
机译:这项对早期基督教对创世纪1-3解释的精湛研究填补了文学上的重大障碍。它追溯了希伯来圣经和新约圣经中的几个主题,直到第二世纪的基督教辩护者爱任纽和奥里根,再到第四世纪的卡帕多西亚主义者。博滕内夫以《圣经》的前三个关键章节作为案例研究,使他能够追溯早期基督教解释方法的起源和发展。他表明,《希伯来圣经》中基本忽略了创世记1-3,尽管犹太遗嘱作者对此没有重点关注,但对亚当和天堂做了几种不同的解释。新约圣经,特别是保罗的信,亚当是与耶稣基督形成鲜明对比的人,他为新人类揭幕。从《新约》本身开始,早期的基督徒就使用类型学和寓言来一方面使旧约人物和事件之间相互联系,另一方面使nChrist成为历史的中心。在新约圣经的领导下,早期的基督教徒解释者和神学家广泛地开发了这些方法。然而,他们也认真地理解了字面意思。他们对圣经​​的解释一般都强调道德上的异性恋和基督教学。一个反例,第二世纪的辩护律师Theochusnof Antioch拒绝了类型解释,并且从未提及基督。布滕内夫(Bouteneffnsee)认为这两个缺席是紧密联系的(73)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Church History》 |2009年第4期|p.875-877|共3页
  • 作者

    Verna E. F. Harrison;

  • 作者单位

    Saint Paul School of Theology;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 14:00:11

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号