首页> 外文期刊>Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture >The Curse of Ham in the Early Modern Era: The Bible and the Justifications for Slavery. By David M. Whitford. St. Andrews Studies in Reformation History. Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate, 2009. xiv + 217 pp. $99.95 cloth.
【24h】

The Curse of Ham in the Early Modern Era: The Bible and the Justifications for Slavery. By David M. Whitford. St. Andrews Studies in Reformation History. Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate, 2009. xiv + 217 pp. $99.95 cloth.

机译:近代早期的火腿诅咒:《圣经》和奴隶制的辩护。戴维·惠特福德(David M.圣安德鲁斯宗教改革史研究。伯灵顿,弗吉尼亚州:阿什盖特(Ashgate),2009年。十四+ 217页,99.95美元。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the book of Genesis (9:20–28), Noah, apparently shamed by his son Ham,nlaid a curse on Ham’s son Canaan, condemning Canaan to servitude. Why,nthen, do we call it the curse of Ham? The story seems to explain the originsnof inferior and superior tribes or nations. At some point in history, the cursencame to be identified primarily or exclusively with Ham, Canaan’s father,nand the unfortunate progeny became Hamites. At least some of Ham’sndescendents could be, and periodically were, identified with Africa, yet theynwere sometimes identified with Asia and Europe, too. Historians ofnAmerican racism, not to mention a good many racists, know this story as anbiblical justification for slavery. How it came to imply the enslavement ofnblack Africans in the New World, while characterizing Africans as Hamitesnand Hamites as hypersexual, is the burden of this book.
机译:在创世记(9:20–28)中,诺亚显然被儿子哈姆(Ham)羞辱,对哈姆的儿子迦南(Canaan)施加了诅咒,谴责迦南沦为奴役。为什么,为什么我们称其为火腿的诅咒?这个故事似乎在解释下级和上级部落或民族的起源。在历史的某个时候,这个诅咒主要或唯一地由迦南的父亲汉姆来确定,不幸的后代变成了汉密特人。至少可以和经常地将非洲的汉姆传教者中的一些人与非洲一并确定,但有时也将其与亚洲和欧洲一起确定。美国种族主义的历史学家们,更不用说很多种族主义者,都知道这个故事是奴隶制的圣经依据。这本书的重担是如何暗示非洲黑人在新世界中的奴役,同时将非洲人形容为Hamitesn,Hamites则定性为性欲。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号