首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Management Studies >Corporate political performance: approaches and theories
【24h】

Corporate political performance: approaches and theories

机译:企业政治绩效:方法和理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual framework of corporate political performance (CPP) in corporate political activity. In fact, CPP refers to political benefits obtained by firms when they formulate and implement political strategies to influence the public policy process though the investment of political resources. This paper focuses on answering what is perhaps the most fundamental question to strategy researchers: "How do firms engage in political strategies to improve their performance?" Design/methodology/approach - In building a theoretical framework, this paper, first, provides a historical analysis of political efficiency and effectiveness. Then, this paper attempts to illustrate conceptually our understanding of political performance process by a generalized and contingent approach. Finally, this paper discusses the framework, its theoretical contribution and practical implications for Chinese management, and comments on limitations for future research. Findings - The paper presents a conceptual CPP model that integrates political efficiency and effectiveness approach. In the conceptual framework, three phases of CPP include sources of political advantage, political competitive advantage and political performance outcome, and three dimensions are identified as political efficiency, effectiveness and adaptiveness. CPP approach is not a "generalized" nature of political performance measurement, as the difference among firms and industries in this area may be significant, which reflects the effect of context, reaction and outcome factors. Research limitations/implications - While it provides a strong theoretical foundation, this paper still has almost little empirical evidence concerning CPP process. However, how to measure CPP has increasingly begun to focus on an important research domain in corporate political strategy literature. This paper believes that this model has a need for future research to test its feasibility by using the measurement scales in Chinese context. Originality/value - This paper is original in its attempt to measure CPP to help the business practice in corporate of political activity, and broaden corporate political strategy research in mainstream strategic management.
机译:目的-本文的目的是介绍公司政治活动中公司政治绩效(CPP)的概念框架。实际上,CPP指的是企业在制定和实施政治策略以通过政治资源的投资来影响公共政策过程时所获得的政治利益。本文着重回答可能是战略研究人员最基本的问题:“公司如何参与政治战略以改善其绩效?”设计/方法/方法-在建立理论框架时,本文首先对政治效率和有效性进行了历史分析。然后,本文试图通过广义和偶然的方法从概念上说明我们对政治绩效过程的理解。最后,本文讨论了该框架,其对中国管理的理论贡献和实际意义,并对未来研究的局限性进行了评论。调查结果-本文提出了一个概念上的CPP模型,该模型整合了政治效率和有效性方法。在概念框架中,CPP的三个阶段包括政治优势,政治竞争优势和政治绩效结果的来源,并且三个维度被确定为政治效率,有效性和适应性。 CPP方法不是政治绩效评估的“概括”性质,因为该领域企业和行业之间的差异可能很大,这反映了上下文,反应和结果因素的影响。研究的局限性/意义-尽管它提供了坚实的理论基础,但关于CPP过程的经验证据仍然很少。但是,如何衡量CPP越来越开始侧重于公司政治战略文献中的一个重要研究领域。本文认为,该模型有必要在未来的研究中,通过在中国语境下使用量表来测试其可行性。原创性/价值-本文旨在衡量CPP以帮助政治活动公司的商业实践,并扩大主流战略管理中的公司政治战略研究,因此具有独创性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号