首页> 外文期刊>Chemosphere >Chemical cleaning of ceramic ultrafiltration membranes - Ozone versus conventional cleaning chemicals
【24h】

Chemical cleaning of ceramic ultrafiltration membranes - Ozone versus conventional cleaning chemicals

机译:陶瓷超滤膜的化学清洁 - 臭氧与常规清洁化学品

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study investigates chemical cleaning mechanisms of a tubular ceramic UF membrane. The effect of cleaner type (ozone (O-3), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH)), clean in place (CIP) pH (11 vs.12), and cleaning sequence on the removal of irreversible fouling of hydrophobic (humic acids) and hydrophilic (alginate with and without calcium (alginate + Ca(+2 )and alginate - Ca+2, respectively)) NOM fractions were investigated. Results showed that different NOM types responded differently to chemical cleaning. Alginate-Ca+2 and humic acids were equivalently removed by NaOCl or NaOH whereas a lower cleaning efficiency of alginate + Ca+2 was observed. Increasing the pH of NaOCl and NaOH CIP increased the removal of the chemically reversible fouling index (UMFIcr). The efficiency of NaOCl was always lower than that of NaOH at the same pH, which was attributed to surface tension (lambda) differences in the CIP water and potential differences in cleaning mechanism. The ceramic UF CIP cleaning using O-3 (0.50 mg O-3/mgC) for 1 h demonstrated higher cleaning efficiency for humic acids and alginate +/- Ca+2, (%UMFIcr 98%), than NaOCl or NaOH alone (%UMFcr80%). The O-3 CIP was as effective as 4 h cleaning using a sequential NaOH/NaOCl or combined NaOCl + NaOH CIP. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本研究研究了管状陶瓷UF膜的化学清洗机制。清洁型(臭氧(O-3),次氯酸钠(NaOCl)和氢氧化钠(NaOH))的影响,干净地(CIP)pH(11 Vs.12),以及去除不可逆污垢的清洁序列研究了疏水性(腐殖酸)和亲水性(分别有钙和没有钙(丙酸盐+ Ca(+ 2)和藻酸盐 - Ca + 2)的氨基级分数。结果表明,不同的NOM类型与化学清洗不同的响应。通过NaoCl或NaOH等等效地除去藻酸钠-Ca + 2和腐殖酸,而藻酸盐+ Ca + 2的清洁效率较低。增加NaoCl和NaOH CIP的pH增加了化学可逆污垢指数(UMFICR)的去除。 NaoCl的效率总是低于同一pH的NaOH的效率,其归因于CIP水中的表面张力(Lambda)差异以及清洁机制的潜在差异。使用O-3(0.50mg O-3 / MgC)的陶瓷UF CIP清洁1 H显示腐殖酸的清洁效率和藻酸盐+/- Ca + 2,(%UMFICR> 98%),而不是单独的NaoCl或NaOH (%UMFCR> 80%)。使用顺序NaOH / NaoCl或组合的NaOCl + NaOH CIP,O-3 CIP与4H清洗一样有效。 (c)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Chemosphere》 |2019年第7期|668-677|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Carleton Univ Dept Civil & Environm Engn 1125 Colonel Dr Ottawa KIS 5B6 ON Canada;

    Carleton Univ Dept Civil & Environm Engn 1125 Colonel Dr Ottawa KIS 5B6 ON Canada;

    Dept Civil Geol & Min Engn Polytech CP 6079 Succursale Ctr Wile Montreal PQ H3C 3A7 Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Carbon balance; Ceramic UF; Chemical cleaning; NOM fouling; Ozone CIP;

    机译:碳平衡;陶瓷UF;化学清洁;NOM FOULLING;臭氧CIP;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号