首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Health & Safety >Does the trial process enable jurors to understand scientific evidence?
【24h】

Does the trial process enable jurors to understand scientific evidence?

机译:审判过程是否可使陪审员了解科学证据?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Eleven jurors have sat in a jury box for six weeks listening to testimo- ny in a trade secrets case. The tes- timony has included highly technical scientific evidence on the manufacture of ultrastable Y zeolites used in fluid cracking and hydrocracking catalysts. Twenty-five witnesses have testified And 291 exhibits have been received. Six of the jurors are regular jurors And five are alternates, but none of Them know who is which. All the Jurors have served since the start of the Trial (1).
机译:十一名陪审员在陪审团中坐了六个星期,以聆听商业秘密案的证词。测试结果包括了用于流化裂化和加氢裂化催化剂的超稳定Y型沸石生产的高科技技术证据。 25位证人作证,已收到291件展品。陪审员中有六名是定期陪审员,五名是候补陪审员,但他们都不知道谁是谁。自审判(1)开始以来,所有陪审员都曾担任过。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号