首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chemical Health and Safety >UN-GHS - Physical hazard classifications of chemicals: A critical review of combinations of hazard classes
【24h】

UN-GHS - Physical hazard classifications of chemicals: A critical review of combinations of hazard classes

机译:UN-GHS-化学品的物理危险性分类:危险性类别组合的严格审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the fundamental principles of the UN-GHS (Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals) is that all hazards of a chemical should be assigned and communicated. There is no general prioritization of hazards in the sense that certain hazard classes are not applicable if another one has been assigned. In contrast to health and environmental hazards, there are physical or chemical factors which preclude certain combinations of physical hazard classes. So far, there is no common understanding as to which combinations are relevant and which not. For example, should a pyrophoric liquid be classified as flammable liquid in addition, or is this redundant and unnecessary? In the course of the implementation of the GHS by countries or sectors and the actual application by industry all over the world, such questions become more and more important. This publication systematically discusses all combinations of the UN-GHS physical hazard classes and assesses them with regard to the relevance of possible simultaneous assignment to a chemical. For many of the combinations an unambiguous decision based on the GHS alone is not possible, thus confirming that the question which physical hazard classes might be assigned simultaneously to a chemical is not trivial. As one more milestone on the path to a globally harmonized system for the classification of hazardous chemicals, this should be discussed and ultimately solved on a global basis. It is the hope that this publication might serve as an impetus for such discussions.
机译:UN-GHS(全球化学品统一分类和标签制度)的基本原则之一是,应分配和传达化学品的所有危害。从某种意义上说,如果某些危险类别不适用(如果已分配了另一种危险类别),则没有一般的危险优先顺序。与健康和环境危害相反,有物理或化学因素排除了某些物理危害类别的组合。到目前为止,对于哪些组合是相关的和哪些无关的没有共识。例如,是否还应将发火液体归为易燃液体,或者这是否多余且不必要?在各国或各部门实施GHS以及全球各行业实际应用的过程中,这些问题变得越来越重要。该出版物系统地讨论了UN-GHS物理危害类别的所有组合,并就可能同时分配给某种化学品的相关性进行了评估。对于许多组合,仅凭全球统一制度(GHS)的明确决定是不可能的,因此,可以肯定的是,哪些物理危害类别可能同时分配给某种化学品的问题并非微不足道。作为通往危险化学品分类全球统一系统的又一个里程碑,应对此进行讨论并最终在全球范围内解决。希望该出版物可以成为此类讨论的动力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Chemical Health and Safety》 |2017年第6期|15-28|共14页
  • 作者单位

    the Bundesansta.lt fiir Materialforschung und -priifung (BAM), Department 2 "Chemical Safety Engineering", Unter den Eichen 87, 12205 Berlin, Germany;

    the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Department 3.7 "Fundamentals of Explosion Protection", Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany;

    the Bundesanstalt fur Materialforschung und -priifung (BAM), Department 2 "Chemical Safety Engineering", Unter den Eichen 87, 12205 Berlin, Germany;

    the Bundesanstalt fur Materialforschung und -priifung (BAM), Department 2 "Chemical Safety Engineering", Unter den Eichen 87, 12205 Berlin, Germany;

    the Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -priifung (BAM), Department 2 "Chemical Safety Engineering", Unter den Eichen 87, 12205 Berlin, Germany;

    the Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -priifung (BAM), Department 2 "Chemical Safety Engineering", Unter den Eichen 87, 12205 Berlin, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号