首页> 外文期刊>Central European History >With a Passion for Reason: Celebrating the Constitution in Weimar Germany
【24h】

With a Passion for Reason: Celebrating the Constitution in Weimar Germany

机译:出于理性的热情:在魏玛德国庆祝宪法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

InT has long been held that Weimar democracy lacked the symbolic appealnnecessary to bind collective sentiment and to win popular support.n1 Whilenrecent revisionist histories of Weimar politics and culture take their cuenfrom Peter Fritzsche’s argument that “Weimar is less a cumulative failure than anseries of bold experiments,”2 the turn toward new approaches and perspectivesnis uneven and incomplete even in those studies that avoid conflating the fragilitynof Weimar democracy with the overall lack or absence of democratic identifi-ncations. Detlev Peukert, while admonishing his readers not to minimize thenWeimar experiment in democracy, also argues that the first German republicnhad no founding ritual, and that this absence in national history attests to angeneral lack of legitimacy.n3 Eric Weitz, in his eloquent survey of the republic’snpromises and tragedy, has little to say about the proponents and forms ofnWeimar democratic culture. ThomasMergel, who shows that theWeimar parlia-nment was marked by a cooperative atmosphere of pragmatic republicanism, attri-nbutes to the republican Left a certain tendency “toward a rationalisticnunderstanding of politics, toward the underestimation of the emotional attach-nment to a flag.”4 This assessment is entirely in line with the earlier claim thatnthe rationalistic optimism (Gotthard Jasper) of the republican forces led to an“consequential underestimation of the integrative power of state symbols”n(Klaus Wippermann).n5
机译:长期以来,人们一直认为,魏玛民主主义缺乏象征意义上的诉求,而这种象征诉求是束缚集体情感和赢得民众支持的必要。n1尽管最近的魏玛政治和文化修正主义历史都受到了彼得·弗里茨切(Peter Fritzsche)的论点的启发: ,[2]即使在那些避免将魏玛民主的脆弱性与总体上缺乏民主的意识混为一谈的研究中,向新方法和观点的转变也仍然是不完整和不完整的。德特列夫·皮克特(Detlev Peukert)在告诫读者不要最小化魏玛的民主试验的同时,还辩称,第一个德国共和党人没有建立仪式,而且国家历史上的这种缺席证明了普遍的合法性不足。共和国的诺言和悲剧,对于魏玛民主文化的支持者和形式几乎无话可说。托马斯·梅杰尔(ThomasMergel)表明,魏玛议会的特点是务实的共和主义的合作气氛,他与共和党左派有一定的倾向,“倾向于对政治进行理性主义的理解,倾向于低估国旗的情感依附”。 4该评估完全符合先前的说法,即共和党力量的理性乐观主义(戈特哈德·贾斯珀)导致“对国家象征的综合力量的相应低估” n(克劳斯·维珀曼)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Central European History》 |2010年第4期|p.666-689|共24页
  • 作者

    Manuela Achilles;

  • 作者单位

    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 14:00:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号