首页> 外文期刊>Central European History >Retroactive Law and Proactive Justice: Debating Crimes against Humanity in Germany, 1945–1950
【24h】

Retroactive Law and Proactive Justice: Debating Crimes against Humanity in Germany, 1945–1950

机译:追溯法与主动司法:辩论德国反人类罪,1945-1950年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

THE Nuremberg Trial may well be the most famous trial of the twentiethrncentury, which is as it should be. After all, the Nuremberg Trial, whilernperhaps not as unprecedented as is frequently assumed, did mark a deci-rnsive turning point in the history of international law.rn1rnIt marked the firstrnbroadly successful attempt to impose the rule of law not just on the conductrnof war but also, in a limited way, on domestic atrocities as well.rn2rnThe famernof this single trial has had the unfortunate side-effect of overshadowing the lit-rnerally thousands of other Nazi trials that took place after World War II,rnhowever. These additional trials can be divided into three categories: thosernthat took place in the domestic courts of victim nations, those that tookrnplace in occupation courts, and, perhaps least well-known, those that tookrnplace in German courts.
机译:纽伦堡审判很可能是二十世纪最著名的审判,应该如此。毕竟,纽伦堡审判虽然可能不像人们通常想象的那样史无前例,但确实标志着国际法历史上的决定性转折。然则,这项单一审判的成名产生了不幸的副作用,使第二次世界大战后进行的成千上万次其他纳粹审判黯然失色。这些额外的审判可以分为三类:在受害国的国内法院中进行的审判,在占领法院中进行的审判以及在德国法院中进行的审判(也许最不为人所知)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Central European History》 |2010年第3期|p.428-463|共36页
  • 作者

    Devin O. Pendas;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:59:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号