...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiology and Therapy >Medical Costs of Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Different Stroke Risks
【24h】

Medical Costs of Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Different Stroke Risks

机译:不同卒中风险的房颤患者口服抗凝剂与华法林的医疗费用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction The Apixaban for the Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE), Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY), and Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF) trials demonstrated that the oral anticoagulants (OACs), apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, respectively, are efficacious for stroke prevention among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Based on clinical trial results this study evaluated medical costs of clinical events associated with use of individual OACs relative to those of warfarin in NVAF patients with moderate and high stroke risk.
机译:前言减少房颤中风和其他血栓栓塞事件的阿哌沙班(ARISTOTLE),长期抗凝治疗(RE-LY)的随机评估,以及利伐沙班每日一次口服直接因子Xa抑制与维生素K拮抗作用相比较,以预防房颤心房颤动中风​​和栓塞试验(ROCKET-AF)试验表明,口服抗凝剂(OAC),阿哌沙班,达比加群和利伐沙班分别对非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者有效预防中风。根据临床试验结果,该研究评估了中度和高卒中风险的NVAF患者与使用单独OAC相对于华法林相关的临床事件的医疗成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号