首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Environmental Law Reports >Aware Simcoe: Environmental and Social Solutions Inc. v. Simcoe (County)
【24h】

Aware Simcoe: Environmental and Social Solutions Inc. v. Simcoe (County)

机译:Aware Simcoe:Environmental and Social Solutions Inc.诉Simcoe(县)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Remedies-Injunctions - Availability of injunctions - Injunctions in specific contexts - Restraint of government acts - Miscellaneous-Developer sought to redesignate and rezone agricultural land for residential subdivision - Applicant environmental group wanted to preserve woodlands on developer's property - County issued stop work order preventing developer from cutting down trees in March 2015 - County lifted stop work order, and group brought application for judicial review - Group brought motion for interlocutory injunction to stay decision of county to lift stop work order and confirm special permit allowing developer to cut trees on property, pending completion of judicial review - Motion dismissed - Mistake made by county in counting votes of two councillors that did not hear evidence did not make difference in final result, and did not result in denial of natural justice - In arguing that developer would soon be in position to cut down trees leaving no redress, group invoked merits of case and did not rely on denial of natural justice - Group was not entitled to stay.
机译:补救措施-禁令-禁令的适用性-特定情况下的禁令-限制政府行为-杂项-开发人员试图重新分配农业用地并将其划分为居住区-申请人环保组织希望在开发人员的财产上保留林地-县政府下达了阻止开发人员的停工令从2015年3月砍伐树木开始-县取消了停止工作令,并提出了司法复议的申请-小组提出了中间禁令的动议,以中止县政府取消停止工作令的决定并确认允许开发商砍伐财产的特别许可,待司法审查完成之前-驳回动议-县政府在盘点两名未听取证据的议员的选票时的失误最终结果没有改变,也没有导致对自然公正的否定-辩称开发商将很快加入砍伐树木的位置无人补救,小组援引了mer的情况下,不依靠自然司法的拒绝-集团无权留下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号