首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge journal of economics >Reproducing the social structure: a Marxist critique of Anthony Giddens's Structuration Methodology
【24h】

Reproducing the social structure: a Marxist critique of Anthony Giddens's Structuration Methodology

机译:再现社会结构:马克思对安东尼·吉登斯的结构方法论的批判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Marxist criticism of Anthony Giddens's sociology tends to fall into one of two camps. On one side, numerous authors have criticised Giddens's methodological writings for their failure to properly elucidate the relationship between agency and structure. Giddens's refusal to accept a role for structural causation has been the primary concern in these methodological appraisals as the upshot is a conception of social relations without any efficacy. On the other side have been the numerous critiques of Giddens's purported renewal of social democracy. Here the criticism tends to focus on Giddens's shift to the political right, but it is rarely noticed that there is also a methodological critique waiting to be developed. Giddens's early work is nothing if not a celebration of the agent with structure demoted to little more than an epiphenomenon. The later writings are, in contrast, almost entirely built around the structural omnipotence of neo-liberal capitalism, and this paper sets out to elucidate the incongruence between these two positions.
机译:马克思对安东尼·吉登斯的社会学的批评倾向于落入两个阵营之一。一方面,许多作者批评吉登斯的方法论著作,因为他们未能正确阐明代理与结构之间的关系。吉登斯拒绝接受因果关系的作用一直是这些方法论评估中的主要关注点,因为结果是对社会关系的概念,没有任何功效。另一方面,对吉登斯所谓的社会民主复兴的无数批评。这里的批评往往集中在吉登斯向政治权利的转变上,但是很少有人注意到还有一种方法论的批评正在等待发展。吉登斯的早期工作,即使不是庆祝这种结构降级为现象的主体,也算不上什么。相反,后来的著作几乎完全围绕新自由主义资本主义的结构无所不能而建立,本文着手阐明这两种立场之间的矛盾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号