首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge journal of economics >The contemporary relevance of a Cambridge tradition: economics as political economy, political economy as social theory and ethical theory
【24h】

The contemporary relevance of a Cambridge tradition: economics as political economy, political economy as social theory and ethical theory

机译:剑桥传统在当代的相关性:经济学作为政治经济学,政治经济学作为社会理论和伦理理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this review essay I set out key aspects of Nuno Martins' The Cambridge Revival of Political Economy. In so doing I also provide some comments on the current state of economics, since these provide some context for an appreciation of what Martins is trying to achieve. Martins is focused on making the positive case for classical political economy (CPE) as a form of theory that is quite different from the modern mainstream. For Martins that difference is based on its approach to the distribution of a surplus expressed through a social ontology that is based on historical open systems and in which the key aspect of open systems is the institutional and hence deliberative activity by which the surplus is decided, which is ultimately an issue for ethics. It is through a 'Cambridge tradition', focusing on Sraffa, Keynes, Lawson and Sen, that CPE, a classical social theory and ethical deliberation are brought together. Bringing them together is an act of synthesis and I conclude by providing a constructive critique of the terms of this synthesis.
机译:在这篇评论文章中,我阐述了努诺·马丁斯(Nuno Martins)的《剑桥政治经济学复兴》的主要方面。在此过程中,我还提供了一些有关当前经济学状况的评论,因为这些评论为理解马丁斯试图达到的目标提供了一些背景。马丁斯(Martins)专注于为古典政治经济学(CPE)提供正面论证,这是一种与现代主流文学截然不同的理论形式。对于Martins而言,差异是基于其分配盈余的方式,该分配是通过基于历史开放系统的社会本体表示的,其中开放系统的关键方面是决定盈余的制度性活动和审议活动,这最终是道德问题。正是通过“剑桥传统”(以“ Sraffa”,“凯恩斯”,“ Lawson”和“ Sen”为重点),CPE,古典社会理论和道德考量融合在一起。将它们组合在一起是一种综合行为,最后,我对这种综合术语提出了建设性的批评。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号