首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge journal of economics >The economic problem of a community: ontological reflections inspired by the Socialist Calculation Debate
【24h】

The economic problem of a community: ontological reflections inspired by the Socialist Calculation Debate

机译:社区的经济问题:社会主义辩论引发的本体论思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Implicitly, the Socialist Calculation Debate is about the connection between neoclassical theory and reality. It involves several ontological presuppositions, with wide-ranging implications. Our purpose is to discuss one of these presuppositions. We want to scrutinise the conception, implicit in the 'market socialist' arguments, that things have economic roles or functions independently of the social environment in which they exist. Primary factors and techniques of production are taken to exist independently of social arrangements; jointly with consumer preferences, they are supposed to define the economic problem of a community. In criticising this conception, we borrow from F. A. Hayek, complementing his reflections with those of Donald Davidson, Tony Lawson and others. We also discuss a second problem, which follows directly from the first: if, in contrast with the market socialists' conception, the economic roles of things depend holistically on complex social processes, how can we compare alternative forms of economic organisation?.
机译:隐含地,社会主义计算辩论是关于新古典理论与现实之间的联系。它涉及几个本体论预设,具有广泛的含义。我们的目的是讨论这些前提之一。我们要仔细研究“市场社会主义”观点中隐含的观念,即事物具有独立于其所处社会环境的经济作用或功能。生产的主要因素和技术被认为独立于社会安排而存在;结合消费者的偏好,他们应该定义一个社区的经济问题。在批评这一概念时,我们借鉴了哈耶克(F. A. Hayek)的观点,并补充了唐纳德·戴维森(Donald Davidson),托尼·劳森(Tony Lawson)等人的观点。我们还讨论了第二个问题,该问题直接来自第一个问题:如果与市场社会主义者的观念相反,事物的经济作用整体上取决于复杂的社会过程,那么我们如何比较经济组织的替代形式呢?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号