首页> 外文期刊>Business Ethics >Not for turning? Power, institutional ethos and the ethics of irreversibility
【24h】

Not for turning? Power, institutional ethos and the ethics of irreversibility

机译:不是为了转弯?权力,制度精神与不可逆伦理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Adoption of an 'ethics of reversibility' can seem fashionably enlightened, even democratic, but appears less radical when issues of power are opened up. Adopting the motif of keeping, this paper sets its questioning of an on-going individuation of ethics within the context of an insidious reduction of institutional mores to business parlance. Keeping Derrida's 'philosophy of reversals' in view, the discussion resists the double bind of attempts to make higher-level decisions ever more 'irreversible' on the one hand, while devolving ethical responsibilities for outcomes downwards on the other. In criss-crossing, back and forth, on variations of these themes, the aim of the paper is to contest a division of moral labour in which the more powerful style themselves as 'not for turning', while those dispossessed of authority are left to vacillate within the market agendas of flexibility and transparency.
机译:采用“可逆性伦理”似乎可以启发时尚,甚至是民主的,但是当权力问题开放时,看起来却不太激进。本文以保持为主题,对在不断将制度道德降低为商业用语的背景下对持续的道德个体化提出质疑。鉴于德里达的“逆转哲学”,该讨论一方面抵制了做出更高决策的尝试的双重束缚,但另一方面却降低了对结果负有道德责任,而对更高结果的决策是“不可逆转的”。在这些主题的变化中来回纵横交错时,本文的目的是对道德劳动分工提出质疑,在道德分工中,更强大的风格本身就是“不适合转身”,而那些权力下放者则留给在灵活性和透明度的市场议程中动摇。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Business Ethics》 |2010年第3期|P.292-307|共16页
  • 作者

    Rolland Munro;

  • 作者单位

    Keele Management School, Keele University, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号