首页> 外文期刊>Built environment project and asset management >Risk mitigation in PFI/PPP project finance A framework model for financiers' bankability criteria
【24h】

Risk mitigation in PFI/PPP project finance A framework model for financiers' bankability criteria

机译:PFI / PPP项目融资中的风险缓解融资人银行能力标准的框架模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose - Earlier studies on risk evaluation in private finance initiative and public private partnerships (PFI/PPP) projects have focussed more on quantitative approaches despite increasing call for contextual understanding of the bankability of risks. The purpose of this paper is to explore the perspectives of UK PFI financiers' regarding the bankability of four critical risks (construction and completion risk, operations, supply and offtake risk) in PPP projects. Design/methodology/approach - Multiple case study strategy was adopted to investigate the phenomenon within real-life context of PFI/PPP projects in UK. Using purposive sampling approach, the study examined school and road PFI/PPP projects through interviews, documentations and focus group discussions. Findings - Results from the study unravelled 36 suitable bankability criteria and some mitigation strategies for evaluating the four critical risks in PFI/PPP during due diligence appraisal. Further evidences from the study also show that, financiers' bankability criteria, when paired along with corresponding risks and mitigation strategies within with a single framework, provides a quick and effective view of bankability of risks in PFI/PPP funding applicatioa Research limitations/implications - In order to ensure generalisability of findings, only projects with similar nature were selected from just two sectors of the UK economy (road and education sectors). The context of the study is also based on UK's PFI/PPP and Construction Industry, as such, other geographical regions in Europe and beyond have not been contextualised in this study. Due to the significance of finance in PFI/PPP contracts, only the perspective of project financiers have been explored in this study. Practical implications - This study provides a less complicated but useful understanding of how risks in PFI/PPP projects may be packaged in a bankable manner to secure the confidence of project financiers. By presenting a qualitative framework, the study addresses concerns of over quantification of risk analysis in PFI/PPP appraisals and provides a relatable approach useful for non-finance oriented PPP practitioners. Social implications - This study addresses the social concerns of too much complexity and ambiguity in PFI/PPP structuring especially regarding factors that could make a project acceptable to lenders. Originality/value - The study proposes a "Bankability and Risk Qualitative Framework", which presents bankability information on critical risks in clear manner and represents critical parameters for winning financiers' funding approvals for PFI/PPP projects.
机译:目的-尽管越来越多地要求对风险的可承受性进行背景了解,但较早的有关私人融资计划和公私伙伴关系(PFI / PPP)项目中的风险评估的研究更多地集中于定量方法。本文的目的是探讨英国PFI融资人对PPP项目中四个关键风险(建设和完工风险,运营,供应和承购风险)的可融资性的观点。设计/方法/方法-采用多案例研究策略来调查英国PFI / PPP项目在现实环境中的现象。该研究使用目的抽样方法,通过访谈,文档和焦点小组讨论,检查了学校和道路PFI / PPP项目。调查结果-研究结果揭示了36项适当的银行标准和一些缓解策略,用于评估尽职调查中PFI / PPP的四个关键风险。该研究的进一步证据还表明,金融家的银行能力标准与单个框架内的相应风险和缓解策略配合使用时,可以快速有效地了解PFI / PPP资金应用中的风险银行能力​​研究局限/含义-为了确保调查结果具有普遍性,仅从英国经济的两个部门(道路和教育部门)中选择了性质相似的项目。该研究的背景还基于英国的PFI / PPP和建筑业,因此,本研究未将欧洲及其他地区的其他地理环境作为背景。由于融资在PFI / PPP合同中的重要性,因此在本研究中仅探讨了项目融资人的观点。实际意义-这项研究对PFI / PPP项目中的风险如何以可银行方式打包以确保项目融资人的信心提供了一个不太复杂但有用的理解。通过提出定性框架,该研究解决了对PFI / PPP评估中风险分析过度量化的担忧,并为非融资型PPP从业人员提供了一种有用的相关方法。社会影响-这项研究解决了PFI / PPP结构中过于复杂和模棱两可的社会问题,尤其是在可能使贷款人接受项目的因素方面。原创性/价值-该研究提出了“银行能力和风险定性框架”,该框架以清晰的方式提供了有关关键风险的银行能力信息,并代表了获得金融机构PFI / PPP项目资金批准的关键参数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号