首页> 外文期刊>Building >What the war taught us
【24h】

What the war taught us

机译:战争教会了我们什么

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although Alistair Darling did not directly mention the planning gain supplement (PGS) in either his pre-Budget report or his Comprehensive Spending Review speech, the chancellor used the occasion to announce a decision that will affect all sections of the construction and property industry. Not only has the government cancelled plans for the unpopular supplement, but it has accepted the recommendations of an all-industry group, led by Sir Stuart Lipton, to introduce a tariff system. The reference to the supplement is buried in the documents issued alongside the pre-Budget report, and it takes the form of a reference to Kate Barker's 2004 Review of Housing Supply. It was this document that first proposed the introduction of the PGS, the purpose of which was defined as a "levy on development to raise additional resources to invest in the infrastructure needed to support housing growth".
机译:尽管阿利斯泰尔·达林(Alistair Darling)在预算前报告或《综合支出审查》演讲中均未直接提及规划增补(PGS),但总理还是借此机会宣布了一项将影响建筑和房地产业各个领域的决定。政府不仅取消了不受欢迎的补贴计划,而且还接受了以斯图尔特·利普顿爵士为首的全行业团体提出的引入关税制度的建议。对该补充文件的引用被埋在预算前报告的发布文件中,并以引用凯特·巴克(Kate Barker)的2004年住房供应审查的形式出现。正是该文件首先提出了引入PGS的建议,PGS的目的被定义为“对发展征税,以筹集更多资源来投资支持住房增长所需的基础设施”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2007年第8505期|p.57|共1页
  • 作者

    Ann Minogue;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:38:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号