首页> 外文期刊>Building >Paradise postponed
【24h】

Paradise postponed

机译:天堂推迟了

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

You don't hear much about Sir John Egan these days. Integrated teams, lean construction, innovation ... all the great doctrines he set out in Rethinking Construction back in 1998 have faded with the years. It's not hard to see why. The industry has spent the intervening decade scrambling to mobilise resources to cope with the sheer volume of work. The problems of getting hold of skilled people - and at the same time responding to the sustainability agenda - have overshadowed everything else. So, as we report this week, it's no surprise that the targets Egan set down have not been met (page 30). Does that matter? Well, some of them were a little fanciful: a 10% cut in time and cost year on year? Not likely, even if construction inflation wasn't running at about 50% over the 10 years. In fact the industry only hit two targets: it recruited 300,000 workers by 2006 and increased its annual turnover and profit 10%. In 2000, the industry's average margin was 4.4%; in 2007 it was 8.2%. Unfortunately, those results owed everything to a boom in demand and absolutely nothing to a revolution in productivity.
机译:这些天,您对约翰·埃根爵士的了解不多。集成的团队,精益的建设,创新……他早在1998年在“重新思考建设”中提出的所有伟大学说都已逐渐消失。不难看出为什么。在过去的十年间,该行业争先恐后地动员资源来应对庞大的工作量。掌握技术人才的问题-同时响应可持续发展议程-掩盖了其他所有问题。因此,正如我们在本周报道的那样,未达到Egan设定的目标也就不足为奇了(第30页)。有关系吗好吧,其中有些人有些幻想:时间和成本每年减少10%?即使在过去十年中建筑通货膨胀率未达到50%左右,这种可能性也不大。实际上,该行业仅实现了两个目标:到2006年,该行业招聘了30万名工人,年营业额和利润增长了10%。 2000年,该行业的平均利润率为4.4%。 2007年为8.2%。不幸的是,这些结果完全归功于需求的增长,而完全没有归因于生产力的革命。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2008年第18期|p.3|共1页
  • 作者

    Denise Chevin;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:37:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号