首页> 外文期刊>Building >Letters & comment
【24h】

Letters & comment

机译:信件和评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Time for a review on fire safety This is quite frustrating for those who have for years been pointing out the various weaknesses in Approved Document B (ADB) ("We have to get this right", 17 April 2015, page 28). At last it looks as if something might be done. Of course, I'm not holding my breath as the usual financial impact is applied and, if it's going to add expense to construction and ultimately to '"UK Building pic", recommendations will be watered down or marginalised and things will go back to the way they were always done. The main issue with any kind of fire protection measure is that it is left for anybody to do. Surely, if it's to do with safety, it should be done by qualified and accredited specialists. I have seen so much rubbish installed in homes as so called fire protection that the incident described by Mr Stunell is no surprise. The only surprise is why it's not reported more often. Review of ADB? Bring it on!
机译:审查消防安全的时间对于多年以来一直在指出批准文件B(ADB)各种缺陷的人(“我们必须做到这一点”,2015年4月17日,第28页),这令人感到沮丧。最后看起来好像有些事情可以做。当然,在应用通常的财务影响时,我不会屏住呼吸,如果这将增加建筑成本,并最终增加“ UK Building pic”的费用,建议将会被淡化或边缘化,并且情况会回落到他们总是做的方式。任何类型的防火措施的主要问题在于,任何人都可以这样做。当然,如果与安全有关,则应由合格且合格的专家来完成。我已经看到在房屋中安装了如此多的垃圾,即所谓的防火保护,以至于Stunell先生描述的事件不足为奇。唯一令人惊讶的是为什么它的报告频率不高。审查亚行?来吧!

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2015年第16期|30-30|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:33:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号