首页> 外文期刊>Building >A SPOTLIGHT ON RIGHTS TO LIGHT
【24h】

A SPOTLIGHT ON RIGHTS TO LIGHT

机译:聚光灯的焦点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a 2010 landmark ruling the High Court ordered an injunction requiring the demolition of the top two floors of a recently completed office building in Leeds. The reason for the decision in HKRUKII (CHC) Ltd vs Heaney [2010] was that the floors interfered with a right to light enjoyed by a neighbouring property. The implications of the decision for the development industry were grave, effectively enabling the owners of properties near development sites enjoying rights to light to hold developers to ransom. The situation was so serious that the Law Commission launched a consultation which initially included a suggestion that rights to light should be abolished altogether. The final recommendations, published at the beginning of December 2014, exclude some of the more radical suggestions, but if they reach the statute book will represent a significant change to the law.
机译:高等法院在2010年作出的具有里程碑意义的裁决中,下达了一项禁令,要求拆除利兹最近完工的办公楼的前两层。 HKRUKII(CHC)Ltd诉Heaney [2010]之所以作出裁决,是因为这些地板干扰了邻近物业享有的采光权。该决定对发展行业的影响是严重的,有效地使开发场所附近的财产所有人享有光明权,以勒索开发商的赎金。这种情况是如此严重,以至于法律委员会发起了一次磋商,该磋商最初包括一项建议,即应完全废除光的权利。最终建议于2014年12月开始发布,其中排除了一些较为激进的建议,但如果这些建议达成法规,将对法律产生重大变化。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building》 |2015年第8期|44-45|共2页
  • 作者

    James Souter;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号