首页> 外文期刊>Building and Environment >Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings
【24h】

Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings

机译:使用多属性方法评估可持续智能建筑的关键绩效指标(KPI)和优先级设置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The main objectives of this paper are to: firstly, identify key issues related to sustainable intelligent buildings (environmental, social, economic and technological factors); develop a conceptual model for the selection of the appropriate KPIs; secondly, test critically stakeholder's perceptions and values of selected KPIs intelligent buildings; and thirdly develop a new model for measuring the level of sustainability for sustainable intelligent buildings. This paper uses a consensus-based model (Sustainable Built Environment Tool- SuBETool), which is analysed using the analytical hierarchical process (AHP) for multi-criteria decision-making. The use of the multi-attribute model for priority setting in the sustainability assessment of intelligent buildings is introduced. The paper commences by reviewing the literature on sustainable intelligent buildings research and presents a pilot-study investigating the problems of complexity and subjectivity. This study is based upon a survey perceptions held by selected stakeholders and the value they attribute to selected KPIs. It is argued that the benefit of the new proposed model (SuBETool) is a 'tool' for 'comparative' rather than an absolute measurement. It has the potential to provide useful lessons from current sustainability assessment methods for strategic future of sustainable intelligent buildings in order to improve a building's performance and to deliver objective outcomes. Findings of this survey enrich the field of intelligent buildings in two ways. Firstly, it gives a detailed insight into the selection of sustainable building indicators, as well as their degree of importance. Secondly, it tesst critically stakeholder's perceptions and values of selected KPIs intelligent buildings. It is concluded that the priority levels for selected criteria is largely dependent on the integrated design team, which includes the client, architects, engineers and facilities managers.
机译:本文的主要目标是:首先,确定与可持续智能建筑相关的关键问题(环境,社会,经济和技术因素);为选择合适的KPI开发概念模型;其次,严格测试利益相关者对所选KPI智能建筑的看法和价值;第三,开发一种新的模型来衡量可持续智能建筑的可持续性水平。本文使用基于共识的模型(可持续建筑环境工具SuBETool),该模型使用层次分析法(AHP)进行多标准决策。介绍了将多属性模型用于智能建筑可持续性评估中的优先级设置。本文首先回顾了有关可持续智能建筑研究的文献,并提出了一项研究复杂性和主观性问题的试点研究。这项研究基于选定的利益相关者对调查的看法及其对选定的KPI的价值。有人认为,新提议的模型(SuBETool)的好处是“比较”的“工具”,而不是绝对的度量。它有潜力为可持续智能建筑的战略未来提供来自当前可持续性评估方法的有益经验,以改善建筑物的性能并提供客观结果。该调查的结果以两种方式丰富了智能建筑领域。首先,它详细介绍了可持续建筑指标的选择及其重要性。其次,它严格评估了利益相关者对选定的KPI智能建筑的看法和价值。结论是,选定标准的优先级很大程度上取决于集成设计团队,该团队包括客户,建筑师,工程师和设施经理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号