首页> 外文期刊>Building and Environment >A formal methods-based Rule Verification Framework for end-user programming in campus Building Automation Systems
【24h】

A formal methods-based Rule Verification Framework for end-user programming in campus Building Automation Systems

机译:基于方法的基于方法的校园楼宇自动化系统的最终用户编程规则验证框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Building Automation Systems have recently exposed programming interfaces for occupants to dynamically control and personalize indoor workplace environments. To this end, the If-This-Then-That paradigm has been proposed as a user-friendly programming approach. However, conflicts, both within the occupant comfort rules and between the rules in open environment and the overall system policy, often result in reduced energy efficiency and other undesired outcomes. In this paper, we propose a software framework based on formal methods to detect and resolve rule conflicts called Rule Verification Framework. The proposed framework builds upon state-of-the-art Satisfiability Modulo Theories and utilizes a suite of algorithms to ensure system correctness and safety. The proposed framework was experimentally evaluated using a prototype implementation developed using Java and the Web Services technology. The proposed framework detected more conflicts and was faster than the previous solutions. Conflict detection algorithms had to work iteratively because conflict resolution resulted in new conflicts.
机译:楼宇自动化系统最近公开了用于乘员的编程接口,以动态控制和个性化室内工作场所环境。为此,IF-THINO-DOT-DOT-DOT-DOT-DON-DOT-DON-DON-DON-DON-DON-DON-DON-DON-DOT-DON-DOT-DON-DIGM。但是,在乘客舒适规则和开放环境中的规则和整体系统政策之间的冲突,往往导致能源效率降低和其他不良结果。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于正式方法来检测和解决规则验证框架的规则冲突的软件框架。所提出的框架在最先进的可满足的模型理论上建立并利用套件套件来确保系统正确性和安全性。通过使用Java和Web服务技术开发的原型实现进行了实验评估了所提出的框架。拟议的框架检测到更多冲突,并且比以前的解决方案更快。冲突检测算法必须迭代地工作,因为冲突决议导致了新的冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号