...
首页> 外文期刊>Broadcast Engineering >Robotic storage libraries
【24h】

Robotic storage libraries

机译:机器人存储库

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Television technology is becoming more sophisticated and complex, and broadcasters' resources are becoming more limited. As broadcasters deploy highly sophisticated media-storage systems, they need to fully understand, evaluate, optimize and manage the content they create and deliver. With storage devices, there is always a trade-off between access speed and the costs of the device and the physical media. Magnetic storage devices have rapidly decreased in price and increased in storage capacity, but they still cannot compete economically with tape-based systems. The capital cost for tape storage is less than 3 cents/MB, while that for high-end, magnetic-disk arrays cost about 30 cents/MB or higher. And that's just the capital cost; it doesn't include cost for the occasional maintenance of disk-storage compo- nents. (Maintenance on RAID controllers, for example, is reported to be about $7/MB.) And magnetic disks alone cannot satisfy the storage and delivery needs of broadcast applications.
机译:电视技术正变得越来越复杂和复杂,广播公司的资源也越来越有限。广播公司部署高度复杂的媒体存储系统时,需要充分理解,评估,优化和管理其创建和交付的内容。使用存储设备时,在访问速度与设备和物理介质的成本之间始终需要权衡取舍。磁存储设备的价格迅速下降,存储容量增加,但仍无法与基于磁带的系统进行经济竞争。磁带存储的资本成本低于3美分/ MB,而高端磁盘阵列的资本成本约为30美分/ MB或更高。那只是资本成本;它不包括偶尔维护磁盘存储组件的成本。 (例如,据报告,RAID控制器的维护费用约为7美元/ MB。)仅磁盘不能满足广播应用程序的存储和交付需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号