首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Who should take responsibility for antisocial personality disorder?
【24h】

Who should take responsibility for antisocial personality disorder?

机译:谁应对反社会人格障碍负责?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The diagnostic boundaries and treatability of personality disorders have always been medically controversial. Whether offenders with antisocial or dissocial personality disorder—"a most elusive category [with] wavering confines"—should be treated in hospital or punished in prison is profoundly controversial. Now, because of highly publicised cases of paedophilic violent offenders released from prison and, the case of Michael Stone, a convicted psychopathic murderer, the medical response to personality disorder has become a subject of national political debate. The dispute between the home secretary and the president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists about whether psychiatrists should be preventively detaining untreatable psychopaths under the Mental Health Act illustrates well the field of political conflict.
机译:人格障碍的诊断界限和可治疗性在医学上一直存在争议。具有反社会人格障碍或非社会人格障碍的罪犯(“最难以捉摸的类别”)应该在医院接受治疗还是在监狱中受到惩罚,这引起了极大的争议。现在,由于从监狱释放的恋童癖暴力罪犯的事件广为流传,而被定罪的精神病杀手迈克尔·斯通(Michael Stone)案,对人格障碍的医学反应已成为全国政治辩论的主题。内政大臣与皇家精神病医生学院院长之间的争执,很好地说明了政治冲突领域,这是根据《精神卫生法》精神病医生是否应预防性地拘留无法治愈的精神病患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号