首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Is voice therapy an effective treatment for dysphonia? A randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Is voice therapy an effective treatment for dysphonia? A randomised controlled trial

机译:语音疗法是否是治疗声音障碍的有效方法?随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives To assess the overall efficacy of voice therapy for dysphonia. Design Single blind randomised controlled trial. Setting Outpatient clinic in a teaching hospital. Participants 204 outpatients aged 17-87 with a primary symptom of persistent hoarseness for at least two months. Interventions After baseline assessments, patients were randomised to six weeks of either voice therapy or no treatment. Assessments were repeated at six weeks on the 145 (71%) patients who continued to this stage and at 12-14 weeks on the 133 (65%) patients who completed the study. The assessments at the three time points for the 70 patients who completed treatment and the 63 patients in the group given no treatment were compared. Main outcome measures Ratings of laryngeal features, Buffalo voice profile, amplitude and pitch perturbation, voice profile questionnaire, hospital anxiety and depression scale, clinical interview schedule, SF-36. Results Voice therapy improved voice quality as assessed by rating by patients (P = 0.001) and rating by observer (P < 0.001). The treatment effects for these two outcomes were 4.1 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 6.6) points and 0.82 (0.50 to 1.13) points. Amplitude perturbation showed improvement at six weeks but not on completion of the study. Patients with dysphonia had appreciable psychological distress and lower quality of life than controls, but voice therapy had no significant impact on either of these variables. bConclusion Voice therapy is effective in improving voice quality as assessed by self rated and observer rated methods.
机译:目的评估语音治疗声音障碍的整体疗效。设计单盲随机对照试验。在教学医院设置门诊诊所。参与者204位17-87岁的门诊患者,其主要症状为持续嘶哑,持续至少两个月。干预措施在基线评估后,患者被随机分配到六周的语音治疗或不治疗。在145名(71%)继续进行此阶段的患者的第6周重复评估,并在133名(65%)完成研究的患者的第12-14周重复评估。比较了70个完成治疗的患者和63个未接受治疗的患者在三个时间点的评估。主要结局指标喉部功能,布法罗语气特征,振幅和音调摄动,声音特征问卷,医院焦虑和抑郁量表,临床访谈时间表,SF-36评分。结果通过患者的评分(P = 0.001)和观察者的评分(P <0.001)评估,语音疗法改善了语音质量。这两个结局的治疗效果分别为4.1(95%置信区间1.7至6.6)点和0.82(0.50至1.13)点。振幅扰动在第6周时有所改善,但在研究结束时并未改善。与对照组相比,发声困难的患者有明显的心理困扰和较低的生活质量,但是语音治疗对这两个变量均无明显影响。 b结论语音疗法有效地改善了通过自评和观察者评等方法评估的语音质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号