首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Politics & International Relations >After Chilcot: The ‘Doctrine of International Community’ and the UK Decision to Invade Iraq
【24h】

After Chilcot: The ‘Doctrine of International Community’ and the UK Decision to Invade Iraq

机译:奇尔科特之后:“国际共同体学说”和英国入侵伊拉克的决定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This article draws on the publicly available oral and documentary evidence produced by the Iraq Inquiry to interrogate the policy impact of the ‘doctrine of international community’, which Tony Blair first articulated during the 1999 Kosovo campaign. Guided by that doctrine, the UK's objective was to reconcile US policy and the UN Security Council. There were two ways to do this: to convince the Bush administration that disarming Iraq was enough and that regime change was a step too far; or to convince the Security Council that disarmament was insufficient and that regime change was necessary. Unfortunately both these strategies failed to deliver the UK objective. To go to war under these circumstances revealed a flaw in the original doctrine, which was to assume that individual states could speak for international society even when they were opposed by a majority of states on the UN Security Council.
机译:本文借鉴了伊拉克调查组织提供的公开口头和书面证据,以审讯“国际社会学说”的政策影响,托尼·布莱尔在1999年科索沃战役中首次表达了这一观点。在这一原则的指导下,英国的目标是调和美国政策与联合国安理会。有两种方法可以做到这一点:让布什政府相信解除伊拉克武装就足够了,而政权更替则是太远了。或者说服安全理事会,裁军是不够的,必须改变政权。不幸的是,这两种策略都未能实现英国的目标。在这种情况下开战揭示了原始学说的一个缺陷,那就是假设即使联合国安理会上多数国家反对,个别国家也可以代表国际社会发言。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号