首页> 外文期刊>British Journal for the History of Philosophy >A Treatise vs. An enquiry: Omissions and Distortions by the New Humeans
【24h】

A Treatise vs. An enquiry: Omissions and Distortions by the New Humeans

机译:专论与质询:新休曼人的遗漏与歪曲

获取原文
       

摘要

There is a definite stress on the primacy of An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding over A Treatise of Human Nature by the so-called New Humeans, who in turn, advocate the sceptical/causal realist interpretation of Hume's empiricism. This paper shows how there has been a deliberate attempt by them to omit and distort certain negative aspects of Hume's life in the belief that in order to accept their interpretations we must first acknowledge that, (1) the Enquiry is the superior text and, (2) reject any criticisms suggesting that Hume only wrote it to help promote the Treatise and fulfil his ambitions for literary fame.View full textDownload full textKeywordsHume, Treatise, Enquiry, Letters, biographyRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2012.718872
机译:明确强调“所谓的新休曼人关于人类对人性论的理解的质询”的首要性,而后者又提倡对休s经验主义的怀疑/因果现实主义解释。本文显示了他们如何故意忽略和扭曲休H生活的某些消极方面,并相信为了接受他们的解释,我们必须首先承认:(1)探究是上等文本,并且( 2)拒绝任何批评,认为休ume只是为了帮助促进《论语》和实现他的文学名望而撰写。查看全文下载全文关键词services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2012.718872

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号