首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Criminology, The >Value Judgments and Criminalization
【24h】

Value Judgments and Criminalization

机译:价值判断与定罪

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Fuelled by contemporary concerns of risk and majoritarian calls to adhere to ‘the values the majority hold dear’ there can be said to be a ‘crisis of criminalization’ in liberal democracies. Whilst criminalization is clearly an important theme in criminology there has been little attention on the value judgments behind processes of criminalization. By drawing on elements of moral philosophy and by applying these ideas to everyday criminalization in Toronto, this article takes a first step towards addressing this omission. The article adopts a pluralist and social constructivist perspective where differential interpretations lead to the same behaviour being celebrated, tolerated or censured, depending on context and power. A model of value judgment and criminalization is offered that includes consideration of moral, prudential, economic and aesthetic judgments. Value consensus is questioned and the political capital required to dictate values is considered.
机译:在当代人们对风险的担忧和多数派人士呼吁坚持“多数人所珍视的价值观”的推动下,自由民主国家可以说是“犯罪化危机”。虽然刑事定罪显然是犯罪学的重要主题,但很少关注刑事定罪过程背后的价值判断。通过借鉴道德哲学的元素并将这些思想应用于多伦多的日常犯罪,本文迈出了解决这一遗漏的第一步。本文采用了多元主义和社会建构主义的观点,在这种观点下,不同的解释会导致根据环境和力量来庆祝,容忍或谴责同一行为。提供了一种价值判断和刑事定罪模型,其中包括对道德,审慎,经济和美学判断的考虑。对价值共识提出质疑,并考虑了决定价值所需的政治资本。

著录项

  • 来源
    《British Journal of Criminology, The》 |2011年第2期|p.278-295|共18页
  • 作者

    Andrew Millie;

  • 作者单位

    School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, 25 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:12:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号