首页> 外文期刊>Brain and cognition >Factor analysis of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory: Inconsistent handedness yields a two-factor solution
【24h】

Factor analysis of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory: Inconsistent handedness yields a two-factor solution

机译:爱丁堡习惯问题清单的因素分析:不一致的观点产生了两因素解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

While neuropsychology has long focused on direction (left versus right) of handedness, a growing body of evidence indicates that degree (inconsistent versus consistent) of handedness is at least as important. A promising feature of this new emphasis on degree of handedness is its greater concordance with extant genetic models of handedness, which posit a continuum from inconsistent-handedness to consistent right-handedness, not a continuum from left- to right-handedness. Specifically, departures away from consistent-right-handedness are thought to reflect the action of a neutral genetic factor that leaves handedness up to random environmental influences. To test whether handedness in inconsistent-handers reflects the presence of multiple factors (compared to the presence of a single factor only in consistent-right-handers), factor analyses of handedness inventory scores were conducted on data from 987 right-handers, divided into consistent- versus inconsistent-handers. Consistent with predictions, analyses of inconsistent- versus consistent-handers yielded two versus one factor solutions, respectively. Results are discussed in terms of their potential implications for genetic models of handedness and for researchers interested in consistency of handedness as a neuropsychological variable. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管神经心理学长期以来一直专注于手性的方向(左与右),但越来越多的证据表明,手性的程度(前后不一致)至少同样重要。这种对惯用性程度的新强调的一个有前途的特征是,它与现有的惯用性遗传模型之间的一致性更高,后者从惯用惯性到惯用惯用右手性构成了连续体,而不是惯用惯性从左惯性到惯用惯性的连续性。具体而言,人们认为偏离一贯惯用右手性反映了中性遗传因素的作用,这种遗传因素使惯用右手性受到随机环境的影响。为了测试不一致者的惯用性是否反映了多个因素的存在(相比之下,一致权利者中仅存在一个因素),对987名惯用右手者的数据进行了惯用性清单评分的因素分析,分为一致处理者与不一致处理者。与预测一致,不一致处理者与一致处理者的分析分别产生了两个因素与一个因素的解决方案。就结果对惯性遗传模型和对惯性一致性作为神经心理学变量感兴趣的研究人员的潜在意义进行了讨论。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号