首页> 外文期刊>Biomass & bioenergy >Growing short rotation coppice on agricultural land in Germany: A Real Options Approach
【24h】

Growing short rotation coppice on agricultural land in Germany: A Real Options Approach

机译:在德国农业用地上种植轮作短耕:实物期权方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In many cases decision-makers apparently do not adapt as fast as expected to changing economic conditions. This is also the case for the conversion of farm land to short rotation coppice. From an economic point of view, short rotation coppice has become more interesting in the last few years. Nevertheless, farm land still is rarely used to grow this quite unknown crop. Several explanatory approaches (e.g., traditionalistic behavior and risk aversion) are currently discussed in order to explain this behavior. A relatively new explanatory approach is the Real Options Approach. The Real Options Approach uses a comprehensive dynamic-stochastic model that combines the uncertainty of investment returns, the sunk costs, and the temporal flexibility of the investment implementation. The quintessence of the Real Options Approach is that-compared to the Classical Investment Theory-the investment triggers will be shifted upwards if investments involve inter-temporal opportunity costs. This paper develops a real options model which allows the determination of triggers on the basis of realistic assumptions. We examined when farmers, who only dispose of sandy soils with little water-storing capacity, should convert set-aside land to short rotation coppice. The results show that farmers should not convert until the present value of the investment returns exceeds the investment costs considerably. Thus, they confirm the empirically observed reluctance in conversion. Furthermore, it turned out that the magnitude of the difference between the Classical Investment Theory and the Real Options Approach depends heavily on the type of stochastic process that underlies the investment returns.
机译:在许多情况下,决策者显然无法像预期的那样迅速适应不断变化的经济状况。农地转为短期轮作后的情况也是如此。从经济学的角度来看,最近几年轮换短期罢工变得更加有趣。然而,农田仍然很少被用来种植这种未知的作物。为了讨论这种行为,目前讨论了几种解释性方法(例如,传统行为和风险规避)。一种相对较新的解释方法是实物期权方法。实物期权方法使用全面的动态随机模型,该模型结合了投资回报的不确定性,沉没成本和投资实施的时间灵活性。与经典投资理论相比,实物期权方法的精髓在于,如果投资涉及跨期机会成本,则投资触发因素将向上移动。本文开发了一个实物期权模型,该模型允许根据实际假设确定触发器。我们研究了仅处置积水能力小的沙质土壤的农民何时应将闲置土地转为短轮耕作。结果表明,在投资回报的现值大大超过投资成本之前,农民不应该进行转换。因此,他们证实了根据经验观察到的转换不愿。此外,事实证明,古典投资理论与实物期权方法之间差异的大小在很大程度上取决于构成投资收益的随机过程的类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号