首页> 外文期刊>Biodiversity and Conservation >Cultivating participatory policy processes for genetic resources policy: lessons from the Genetic Resources Policy Initiative (GRPI) project
【24h】

Cultivating participatory policy processes for genetic resources policy: lessons from the Genetic Resources Policy Initiative (GRPI) project

机译:培育遗传资源政策的参与性政策过程:遗传资源政策倡议(GRPI)项目的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of the paper is to draw lessons and document experiences from the Genetic Resources Policy Initiative (GRPI) project, a project which has been underway in six countries and two sub-regions during the last 5 years. Its focus has been to experiment an approach to participatory policy processes, coined by the project, called the multi-stakeholder, multi-disciplinary and multi-sector or in short the 3M. This approach, which was demand-driven due to the nature of the policy problems being examined, aims to create a platform to address competing interests inherent in genetic resources issues from multiple perspectives. It is meant to enable different stakeholders to balance issues they diverge and/or converge upon in genetic resources management, thereby harmonizing trade-offs, objectives and strategies. Experiences from the project in applying the 3M in Egypt, Nepal, Vietnam Peru and Zambia highlight several lessons in participatory policy processes. The experiences show that the success or otherwise of participatory policy making processes is dependent on various factors that have to do with stakeholder capacities, process orientation, shared understanding versus vested interests and institutional functions. They highlight that the most effective approach to stakeholder engagement in policy processes is to construct them around an actively engaged ‘process leader’ that possesses, or has the potential to champion the process by mobilising the required cognitive knowledge and institutional engagement. They further suggest that since genetic resources policy issues are cross-cutting, they will demand a more holistic approach with a clear identification of impact pathways through which policy changes can be expected to influence the outcome variables. Since policy making processes are perpetual, the question of sustaining project ideas and recommendations beyond the life of a project has to be part of the planning exercise in any participatory genetic resources policy research and formulation.
机译:本文的目的是从遗传资源政策倡议(GRPI)项目中吸取经验教训并记录经验,该项目在过去5年中已在六个国家和两个分地区进行。它的重点是尝试一种由项目创造的参与性政策过程的方法,称为多利益相关方,多学科和多部门,或者简称为3M。由于正在研究的政策问题的性质,这种方法由需求驱动,旨在建立一个平台,从多个角度解决遗传资源问题中固有的竞争利益。它旨在使不同的利益相关者在遗传资源管理中平衡他们分歧和/或趋同的问题,从而协调权衡,目标和策略。该项目在埃及,尼泊尔,越南,秘鲁和赞比亚应用3M的经验强调了参与性政策流程中的一些经验教训。经验表明,参与性决策过程的成功与否取决于与利益相关者能力,过程取向,共同理解,既得利益和机构职能有关的各种因素。他们强调,让利益相关者参与政策过程的最有效方法是围绕一个积极参与的“过程领导者”构建他们,该“领导者”具有或有可能通过动员所需的认知知识和机构参与来支持过程。他们进一步建议,由于遗传资源政策问题是贯穿各领域的问题,因此,他们将需要一种更加全面的方法,并明确确定影响途径,通过这些途径可以预期政策变化会影响结果变量。由于决策过程是永久性的,因此在任何参与式遗传资源政策研究和制定过程中,在项目生命周期之外维持项目思想和建议的问题都必须成为计划工作的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号