...
首页> 外文期刊>Benchmarking >Benchmarking agility assessment approaches: a case study
【24h】

Benchmarking agility assessment approaches: a case study

机译:敏捷性基准评估方法:案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to benchmark the assessment approaches of agility in a manufacturing organization. Design/methodology/approach - The criteria for agility assessment were identified comprehensively based on literature review. The agility assessment was done using Multi Grade Fuzzy and Fuzzy logic approaches, and the results were benchmarked. Findings - Based on Multi Grade Fuzzy approach, the agility index was found to be 6.6; Fuzzy logic approach reveals the agility index as (5.37, 6.91, 8.45) which indicated the case organization is agile. The gaps were identified from both the approaches and the results were corroborated. Research limitations/implications - In the present study, Multi Grade Fuzzy and Fuzzy logic approaches were only benchmarked. Also, the benchmarking exercise was done only in one manufacturing organization. Practical implications - The benchmarking study was conducted in a manufacturing organization. The practitioners' views were gathered and they were involved in the study to substantiate the practical validity. Originality/value - The benchmarking study between two approaches for agility assessment was found to be original and adds value to the agility assessment field.
机译:目的-本文的目的是对制造组织中敏捷性的评估方法进行基准测试。设计/方法/方法-根据文献综述全面确定了敏捷性评估的标准。使用多级模糊和模糊逻辑方法进行了敏捷性评估,并对结果进行了基准测试。结果-基于多级模糊方法,敏捷度指数为6.6;模糊逻辑方法显示敏捷指数为(5.37,6.91,8.45),表明案例组织是敏捷的。从这两种方法中都发现了差距,结果得到了证实。研究局限/含意-在本研究中,仅对多级模糊和模糊逻辑方法进行了基准测试。此外,基准测试仅在一个制造组织中进行。实际意义-基准研究是在制造组织中进行的。收集了从业者的观点,他们参与了研究以证实其实际有效性。原创性/价值-两种敏捷性评估方法之间的基准研究被认为是原创的,并为敏捷性评估领域增加了价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号