...
首页> 外文期刊>Benchmarking >Benchmarking knowledge management practices in small and medium enterprises A fuzzy multicriteria group decision-making approach
【24h】

Benchmarking knowledge management practices in small and medium enterprises A fuzzy multicriteria group decision-making approach

机译:中小企业知识管理实践的对标模糊多准则群体决策方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to formulate the process of measuring and benchmarking the performance of knowledge management (KM) practices as a multicriteria group decision-making problem and present a new multicriteria group decision-making approach for effectively evaluating the performance of KM practices to meet the interests of various stakeholders in small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Design/methodology/approach - A new multicriteria group decision-making approach is developed for evaluating the performance of KM practices of individual SMEs. Intuitionistic fuzzy numbers are used for representing the subjective assessments of decision makers in evaluating the relative importance of the evaluation criteria and the performance of individual KM practices with respect to specific evaluation criteria. A fuzzy multicriteria group decision-making algorithm is developed for measuring and benchmarking the performance of alternative KM practices. Findings - The proposed multicriteria group decision-making approach is capable of effectively evaluating the performance of KM practices through adequately considering the presence of multiple decision makers, the multi-dimensional nature of the evaluation problem, and appropriately modeling the subjectiveness and imprecision of the evaluation process. The presentation of an example shows that the proposed fuzzy multicriteria group decision-making algorithm is simple to use and efficient in computation. Research limitations/implications - The outcome of the multicriteria group decision-making approach is highly dependent on the inputs provided by the decision maker. Practical implications - The novelty from this research lies in the utilization of a multicriteria group decision-making approach for evaluating the performance of KM practices in an organization. The outcome from the performance evaluation process allows the enterprise to adopt appropriate KM practices for achieving competitive advantages. Social implications - The proposed multicriteria group decision-making approach has a significant social implication as it can be used as a decision-making tool for providing various decision makers in SMEs with useful and strategic information concerning the performance of KM practices in a given situation. Originality/value - The originality of this paper lies in the development of the multicriteria group decision-making approach for effectively measuring and benchmarking the performance of KM practices of individual SMEs.
机译:目的-本文的目的是制定衡量和基准化知识管理(KM)实践绩效的过程,以此作为多准则小组决策问题,并提出一种新的多准则小组决策方法,以有效评估KM的绩效满足中小型企业(SME)各种利益相关者利益的实践。设计/方法/方法-开发了一种新的多准则小组决策方法,用于评估各个中小企业的知识管理实践的绩效。直觉模糊数用于代表决策者的主观评估,用于评估评估标准的相对重要性以及个别KM实践相对于特定评估标准的绩效。开发了一种模糊多准则组决策算法,用于测量和基准化其他KM实践的性能。调查结果-拟议的多准则小组决策方法能够通过充分考虑多个决策者的存在,评估问题的多维性质以及对评估的主观性和不精确性进行适当建模,从而有效评估知识管理实践的绩效处理。实例演示表明,所提出的模糊多准则群决策算法简单易用,计算效率高。研究的局限性/含意-多准则小组决策方法的结果高度依赖于决策者提供的投入。实际意义-这项研究的新颖之处在于,采用了一种多准则小组决策方法来评估组织中KM实践的绩效。绩效评估过程的结果使企业可以采用适当的KM做法来获得竞争优势。社会影响-拟议的多准则小组决策方法具有重大的社会意义,因为它可以用作决策工具,为中小型企业的各种决策者提供有关给定情况下KM实践表现的有用和战略信息。原创性/价值-本文的原创性在于开发多标准小组决策方法,以有效地衡量和基准化中小型企业的KM实践的绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号