首页> 外文期刊>Benchmarking >A collaborative scenario-based decision model for a disrupted dual-channel supply chain: Benchmarking against the centralized structure
【24h】

A collaborative scenario-based decision model for a disrupted dual-channel supply chain: Benchmarking against the centralized structure

机译:用于中断双通道供应链的基于协作情景的决策模型:对集中式结构的基准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - Distribution systems usually utilize both traditional retailing channels in conjunction with e-channels. The purpose of this paper is to investigate a dual-channel supply chain, comprising a traditional retailing channel and an e-channel under disruptioa By benchmarking against the centralized decision structure, the authors intend to propose a collaboration model to achieve channel coordination as well as more reliable decisions. Design/methodology/approach - Four different channel disruption scenarios, with customers' reaction toward disruptions, are examined, and then, optimal pricing decisions for both centralized and decentralized decision-making structures are extracted. Next, a collaboration mechanism based on the dominancy power of channel members is developed to entice all channel members to participate in channel coordination. By benchmarking the proposed collaboration model against both the decentralized/centralized structures a win-win solution is guaranteed for all channel members. In addition, the proposed model ensures more reliable decisions than the centralized structure, as it guarantees less fluctuated income levels. Findings - This study shows, as the disruption probability grows, the channel profit decreases while the channel-retailing price increases. Furthermore, the exact alignment of the centralized decision-making approach and the proposed collaboration model is not achievable due to the problem infeasibility. Numerical experiments and sensitivity analyses benchmark the performance of the proposed collaboration mechanism against the centralized structure for the full alignment with centralized decision-making approach. Originality/value - This study contributes to the channel conflict literature as jointly considers pricing decisions, disruptions and coordination. Further, consumers' reaction toward disruption is analyzed through a transshipment agreement.
机译:目的 - 分配系统通常与电子通道结合使用传统的零售通道。本文的目的是调查双通道供应链,包括传统零售通道和通过对集中决策结构的基准测试的传统零售通道和电子渠道,提出了协作模型来实现渠道协调以及更可靠的决定。检查/方法/方法 - 在顾客对中断的反应中进行了四种不同的信道中断场景,然后提取了集中式和分散决策结构的最佳定价决策。接下来,开发了基于信道构件的主导力的协作机制,以吸引所有信道成员参与信道协调。通过对拟议的协作模型进行基准测试,对分散/集中式结构都保证了所有渠道成员的双赢解决方案。此外,所提出的模型可确保比集中式结构更可靠的决策,因为它保证了不太波动的收入水平。结果 - 本研究表明,随着中断概率的发展,渠道利润减少,而渠道零售价格增加。此外,由于问题不可行,因此无法实现集中决策方法的确切对准和所提出的协作模型。数值实验和敏感性分析基准,建议的协作机制对集中式结构的性能,以便与集中决策方法完全对齐。原创性/价值 - 本研究有助于渠道冲突文献,共同考虑定价决策,中断和协调。此外,通过转运协议分析了消费者对破坏的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号