...
首页> 外文期刊>Behaviour & Information Technology >Must evaluation methods be about usability? Devising and assessing the utility inspection method
【24h】

Must evaluation methods be about usability? Devising and assessing the utility inspection method

机译:评估方法必须与可用性有关吗?设计和评估公用事业检查方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Whereas research in usability evaluation abounds, few evaluation approaches focus on utility. We present the utility inspection method (UIM), which prompts evaluators about the utility of the system they evaluate. The UIM asks whether a system uses global platforms, provides support infrastructure, is robust, gives access to rich content, allows customisation, offers symbolic value and supports companionship among users and between users and developers. We compare 47 participants' use of UIM and heuristic evaluation (HE). The UIM helps identify more than three times as many problems as HE about the context of activities; HE helps identify 2.5 times as many problems as UIM about the interface. Usability experts consider the problems found with UIM more severe and more complex to solve compared to those found with HE. We argue that UIM complements existing usability evaluation methods and discuss future research on utility inspection.
机译:尽管可用性评估方面的研究很多,但很少有评估方法关注效用。我们介绍了实用程序检查方法(UIM),它会提示评估人员有关他们评估的系统的实用程序的信息。 UIM询问系统是否使用全球平台,是否提供支持基础结构,是否健壮,是否可以访问丰富的内容,是否允许自定义,提供符号价值以及是否支持用户之间以及用户与开发人员之间的伙伴关系。我们比较了47名参与者对UIM和启发式评估(HE)的使用。 UIM可以帮助您确定有关活动背景的问题,其数量是HE的三倍之多; HE可以帮助您确定关于UI的问题,数量是UIM的2.5倍。可用性专家认为,与HE相比,UIM所发现的问题更严重,更复杂。我们认为UIM是对现有可用性评估方法的补充,并讨论了公用事业检查的未来研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号