Is everyone Bayes? On the testable implications of Bayesian Fundamentalism - Erratum

摘要

On page 213 of the commentary by Speekenbrink and Shanks (2011) on the target article by Jones & Love, there are some equations in which the operators are missing. The sentence that reads: For example, suppose the sequence of rewards is Si and the sequence of responses is S_8. The first response X_1 = 1 implies that V_1+V_2 + V_3 + U_4V_5V_6V_7V_8; the second response X_2l implies that V_1V_2V_3V_4; the third response x_3 1 implies that V_1V_2. One choice of values consistent with this is v_jj.