...
首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral and Brain Sciences >Tinbergen's 'four questions' provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people
【24h】

Tinbergen's 'four questions' provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people

机译:廷伯根的“四个问题”提供了一个正式框架,可以更完整地理解有利于有吸引力的人的亲社会偏见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We adopt Tinbergen's (1963) "four questions" approach to strengthen the criticism by Maestripieri et al. of the non-evolutionary accounts of favouritism toward attractive individuals, by showing which levels of explanation are lacking in these accounts. We also use this approach to propose ways in which the evolutionary account may be extended and strengthened.
机译:我们采用Tinbergen(1963)的“四个问题”方法来加强Maestripieri等人的批评。通过显示在这些陈述中缺少哪些解释级别,对吸引人的非革命性陈述进行了偏爱。我们还使用这种方法来提出可以扩展和加强进化帐户的方式。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Behavioral and Brain Sciences》 |2017年第2017期|38-39|共2页
  • 作者单位

    Macquarie Univ, Dept Psychol, N Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia|Macquarie Univ, ARC Ctr Excellence Cognit & Its Disorders, N Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia|Macquarie Univ, Percept Act Res Ctr, N Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia;

    Univ Newcastle, Sch Psychol, Ourimbah, NSW 2258, Australia;

    Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Psychol, Bathurst, NSW 2795, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号