首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of Politics & History >Anti-Cartel or Anti-Foreign? Australian Attitudes to Anti-Competitive Behaviour before the First World War
【24h】

Anti-Cartel or Anti-Foreign? Australian Attitudes to Anti-Competitive Behaviour before the First World War

机译:反卡特尔还是反外国?第一次世界大战前澳大利亚人对反竞争行为的态度

获取原文
           

摘要

More than a century elapsed between Australia's first legislative attempts to modify anticompetitive behaviour (the Australian Industries Preservation Act 1906) and its most recent efforts to criminalise price fixing (Trade Practices Amendment (Cartel Conduct and Other Measures) Act 2009). After a burst of activity in the first decade of Federation, the intervening years saw only sporadic interest by governments to promote competitive markets, with limited impact until the late 1960s. This paper assesses the first period of Australia's attempts to promote competition. It traces the political, economic and social environments of anticompetitive business behaviour in Australia from 1901 up to World War I. We suggest that Australia's initial forays into regulating cartels were motivated more by protectionist aims than by efforts to increase competition, which in part also explains the next half-century of legislative apathy towards anti-competitive legislation.
机译:在澳大利亚首次修改反竞争行为的立法尝试(《澳大利亚工业保护法》(1906年))和最近将价格固定化定罪(《贸易惯例修正案(汽车行为和其他措施)法》(2009年))之间,已经过去了一个多世纪的时间。在联邦成立后的头十年里,活动激增,随后的几年中,各国政府对促进竞争性市场的兴趣只是零星的,直到1960年代后期才产生了有限的影响。本文评估了澳大利亚促进竞争的第一阶段。它追溯了从1901年到第一次世界大战期间澳大利亚反竞争商业行为的政治,经济和社会环境。我们建议,澳大利亚对卡特尔的最初尝试更多是出于保护主义的目的,而不是为了增强竞争的努力,这在一定程度上也解释了下半个世纪对反竞争立法的立法冷漠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号