首页> 外文期刊>Aslib Proceedings >Health information for the consumer: NHS vs the BBC
【24h】

Health information for the consumer: NHS vs the BBC

机译:消费者的健康信息:NHS与BBC

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate of the results of a survey which asked people where they went online for their health information, why and what success they had. The prime purpose of the questionnaire was to obtain information on the audience for health information web sites and to obtain feedback as to what they used online health sites for. The focus was on two major publicly funded health internet sites: NHS Direct Online and the BBC web site. Design/methodology/approach - An online survey was carried out with a population of internet users in the UK in the winter of 2004, yielding a sample of nearly 1,000 (923) people and a response rate of 4.4 per cent was achieved.rnFindings - The survey identified that indeed both sites were well used although their users were very different in terms of how they arrived at each site and in terms of what they were looking for. Outcomes resulting from using the sites are discussed and compared. Though outcomes differed between NHS Direct Online and the BBC the data suggest that the national sites were not meeting the demanding information needs of some users.rnOriginality/value - It is the first time that two publicly funded national sites that aim to provide the UK population with health information are compared.
机译:目的-本文的目的是评估一项调查的结果,该调查询问人们在何处上网获取健康信息,为什么以及取得了什么成功。问卷的主要目的是在受众群体中获取健康信息网站上的信息,并获得有关他们使用在线健康网站目的的反馈。重点是两个主要的公共资助的健康互联网网站:NHS Direct Online和BBC网站。设计/方法/方法-2004年冬季,对英国的互联网用户进行了一项在线调查,抽取了将近1000名(923)人作为样本,答复率为4.4%。调查表明,尽管两个站点的用户在到达每个站点的方式以及所寻找的内容方面都大不相同,但实际上两个站点都得到了很好的利用。讨论并比较了使用网站所产生的结果。尽管NHS Direct Online和BBC的结果有所不同,但数据表明这些国家站点无法满足某些用户的苛刻信息需求。原始性/价值-这是两个国家首次提供公共资助的旨在提供英国人口的国家站点与健康信息进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号